Re: EPEL EpSCO Email Meeting:

2014-09-12 Thread Carl George
pment List Subject: Re: EPEL EpSCO Email Meeting: On 11 September 2014 08:41, Bohuslav Kabrda mailto:bkab...@redhat.com>> wrote: Problem trying to be solved: EPEL's original goal around a 5-7 year product has run into issues where various packages end up having shorter lifet

Re: EPEL EpSCO Email Meeting:

2014-09-11 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 11 September 2014 08:41, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > Problem trying to be solved: > > EPEL's original goal around a 5-7 year product has run into issues where > various packages end up having shorter lifetimes than can be maintained in > that period. What happens is that the upstream is changing

Re: EPEL EpSCO Email Meeting:

2014-09-11 Thread Bohuslav Kabrda
> Problem trying to be solved: > EPEL's original goal around a 5-7 year product has run into issues where > various packages end up having shorter lifetimes than can be maintained in > that period. What happens is that the upstream is changing the code too > massively for any sort of 'back-port' t

Re: EPEL EpSCO Email Meeting:

2014-09-05 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 5 September 2014 12:52, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 18:20:19 -0600 > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > So this is my general proposal for per point release. > > > > > > Problem trying to be solved: > > > > EPEL's original goal around a 5-7 year product has run into issues > > wher

Re: EPEL EpSCO Email Meeting:

2014-09-05 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 18:20:19 -0600 Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > So this is my general proposal for per point release. > > > Problem trying to be solved: > > EPEL's original goal around a 5-7 year product has run into issues > where various packages end up having shorter lifetimes than can be >

Re: EPEL EpSCO Email Meeting:

2014-09-05 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 5 September 2014 08:27, Jeff Sheltren wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: >> >> >>- EpSCO governance. >> - Lifetime of initial committee (9 months?) >> >> This is fine for me. Somewhere in the 6-12 month range seems reasonable. > I am going to t

Re: EPEL EpSCO Email Meeting:

2014-09-05 Thread Jeff Sheltren
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > >- EpSCO governance. > - Lifetime of initial committee (9 months?) > > This is fine for me. Somewhere in the 6-12 month range seems reasonable. >- > - Replacement of any exiting members (replacement by formal v

Re: EPEL EpSCO Email Meeting:

2014-09-04 Thread Brian Stinson
On Sep 04 18:20, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > So this is my general proposal for per point release. > > > Problem trying to be solved: > > EPEL's original goal around a 5-7 year product has run into issues where > various packages end up having shorter lifetimes than can be maintained in > that

Re: EPEL EpSCO Email Meeting:

2014-09-04 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 4 September 2014 10:13, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 16:08:34 -0600 > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > So in todays (2014-08-29) meeting, we wanted to move the various > > policy discussions to email so that people could take their time to > > reply and also to allow for people w

Re: EPEL EpSCO Email Meeting:

2014-09-04 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 09/05/2014 12:49 AM, Karsten Wade wrote: For anything related to the new repo, this is an important part of the idea. We want to set a new expectation with the new brand. Maybe we can just tie it to the upstream-of-Fedora -- 13 months, rolls with each Fedora release, etc.? It would look sa

Re: EPEL EpSCO Email Meeting:

2014-09-04 Thread Karsten Wade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/04/2014 02:05 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > Perhaps this is an issue where a shorter life-cycle expectation > needs to be set? For anything related to the new repo, this is an important part of the idea. We want to set a new expectation with the new b

Re: EPEL EpSCO Email Meeting:

2014-09-04 Thread Jim Perrin
On 09/04/2014 11:13 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 16:08:34 -0600 > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >> So in todays (2014-08-29) meeting, we wanted to move the various >> policy discussions to email so that people could take their time to >> reply and also to allow for people who co

Re: EPEL EpSCO Email Meeting:

2014-09-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 16:08:34 -0600 Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > So in todays (2014-08-29) meeting, we wanted to move the various > policy discussions to email so that people could take their time to > reply and also to allow for people who could not attend time to > respond. Right. > Going fr

EPEL EpSCO Email Meeting:

2014-08-29 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
So in todays (2014-08-29) meeting, we wanted to move the various policy discussions to email so that people could take their time to reply and also to allow for people who could not attend time to respond. Going from the web-page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL-faster-repo-ideas the following