-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/20/2014 05:30 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> I've never heard of this EPIC repository and google doesn't seem to
> know it either. Where can this be found?
It doesn't exist, it's an idea that Robyn has floated semi-seriously
as a way to prov
On 20.03.2014 23:15, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 20 March 2014 12:02, Remi Collet mailto:fed...@famillecollet.com>> wrote:
Hi,
RHSCL 1.0 is GA since September.
RHSCL 1.1 Beta is released today:
http://developerblog.redhat.com/2014/03/20/rhscl-1-1-beta-available-apache-mo
On 20 March 2014 17:13, Jim Perrin wrote:
>
>
> On 03/20/2014 05:15 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> > I have been thinking about this and wondering if SCL's might be better
> > under Robyn's "EPIC" (Extra Packages for Infrastructure and Clouds)
>
>
> I hate that name, but the idea behind the
On 03/20/2014 05:15 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> I have been thinking about this and wondering if SCL's might be better
> under Robyn's "EPIC" (Extra Packages for Infrastructure and Clouds)
I hate that name, but the idea behind the repo is sound.
> would be something that could have les
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 04:15:18PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> I have been thinking about this and wondering if SCL's might be better
> under Robyn's "EPIC" (Extra Packages for Infrastructure and Clouds) which
> would be something that could have less rigid rules for keeping going for
> 12
On 20 March 2014 12:02, Remi Collet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> RHSCL 1.0 is GA since September.
>
> RHSCL 1.1 Beta is released today:
>
> http://developerblog.redhat.com/2014/03/20/rhscl-1-1-beta-available-apache-mongodb/
>
> As EPEL is the common repository to find additional packages for RHEL, I
> really
