-in.
Chris Aniszczyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04/10/2008 07:23 PM
Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
To
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
cc
Subject
[equinox-dev] [p2] plug-in versions
I noticed
: [equinox-dev] [p2] plug-in versions
I don't think we ever decided on this. The thinking was that since no API
was being declared, we might leave the plug-ins with a number 1.0 and
then move to 1.0
than functionality.
Thomas Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04/14/2008 09:42 AM
Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
To
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
cc
Subject
Re: [equinox-dev] [p2] plug-in versions
My
the numbering of their bundles so we ship
whatever we get.
Jeff
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Arthorne
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 10:23 AM
To: Equinox development mailing list
Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] [p2] plug-in versions
Let's discuss
I noticed that all of p2 plug-ins are currently 0.10.qualifier... shouldn't
this be 1.0.0.qualifier since these have been graduated and will be
included in the SDK for 3.4?
I ask this as I'm trying to straighten out some plug-in dependency ranges
in PDE.
Cheers,
---
Chris Aniszczyk | IBM Lotus
