mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
cc
Subject
Re: [equinox-dev] [prov] Download manager support for pack200
Just out of curiosity, why do you use the external binary to do the
pack/unpack and not the java.util.jar.Pack200 class? It seems to me that
a fragment that is EE
: [equinox-dev] [prov] Download manager support for pack200
|
|
right
@eclipse.org
cc
Subject
Re: [equinox-dev] [prov] Download manager support for pack200
If the Pack200 class is loaded from the VM then it will fall under the
boot class loader. There is no way we can throw that class loader away.
Are you suggesting that we could somehow load this class from
Date: 01/25/2008 09:57 AM
Subject:Re: [equinox-dev] [prov] Download manager support for pack200
PROTECTED]
01/25/2008 02:53 AM
Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
To
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
cc
Subject
Re: [equinox-dev] [prov] Download manager support for pack200
Just out of curiosity, why do you use the external binary
Subject:[equinox-dev] [prov] Download manager support for pack200
respond to
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
To
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
cc
Subject
[equinox-dev] [prov] Download manager support for pack200
I seem to remember that someone was working on adding to support to our
download manager
list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
cc
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Re: [equinox-dev] [prov] Download manager support for pack200
how would that work on J2ME (CDC/Foundatoin)?
Jim