Re: [equinox-dev] API Addition

2010-04-12 Thread Olivier Thomann
Done. Next build should be clean. From: Thomas Watson To: Equinox development mailing list Date: 2010-04-12 10:09 Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] API Addition Sent by: equinox-dev-boun...@eclipse.org This change is related to https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=307527 One way or

Re: [equinox-dev] API Addition

2010-04-12 Thread Thomas Watson
-| |04/12/2010 08:43 AM | >--| |> | Subject: | |> >----------------

Re: [equinox-dev] API Addition

2010-04-12 Thread Olivier Thomann
Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] API Addition Sent by: equinox-dev-boun...@eclipse.org Yes, this was discussed on Monday and we agreed the bug was a must fix and the small API was required. Tom ___ equinox-dev mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org https

Re: [equinox-dev] API Addition

2010-04-12 Thread Thomas Watson
-| |04/11/2010 07:31 PM | >--| |> | Subject: | |> >---------------

Re: [equinox-dev] API Addition

2010-04-11 Thread Pascal Rapicault
Done. On 2010-04-11, at 6:44 PM, Jeff McAffer wrote: > Great. I did not recall this as one of the approved ones. Would be good to > note that in the bug for consistency and transparency. > > Thanks for the info. > > Jeff > > > On 2010-04-11, at 4:15 PM, Pascal Rapicault wrote: > >> During

Re: [equinox-dev] API Addition

2010-04-11 Thread Jeff McAffer
Great. I did not recall this as one of the approved ones. Would be good to note that in the bug for consistency and transparency. Thanks for the info. Jeff On 2010-04-11, at 4:15 PM, Pascal Rapicault wrote: During last week team meeting, we went through all the API bugs to discuss as a t

Re: [equinox-dev] API Addition

2010-04-11 Thread Pascal Rapicault
During last week team meeting, we went through all the API bugs to discuss as a team their relevance, impact, and get a verbal approval from the PMC thus streamlining the release of the API for all parties involved. This particular bug was part of this discussion, and it needs to be noted that i

Re: [equinox-dev] API Addition

2010-04-11 Thread Jeff McAffer
I don't recall a API change proposal or approval for this. The bug cited does have the API keyword but no approvals AFAICT. Was that done somewhere else? Jeff On 2010-04-09, at 8:52 PM, Pascal Rapicault wrote: > In order to address bug 303990 - metarequirement seems broken, I have had to >

[equinox-dev] API Addition

2010-04-09 Thread Pascal Rapicault
In order to address bug 303990 - metarequirement seems broken, I have had to add two new constants in the IProvisioningAgent INSTALLER_AGENT and INSTALLER_PROFILEID. This was a necessity because otherwise the director application was not able to install metarequirements. PaScaL_