Hi Tom,
2014-10-30 12:11 GMT-02:00 Thomas Watson tjwat...@us.ibm.com:
I changed the subject of the chain also, it was (no subject) before :)
Thanks for that ;)
We could provide some UUID that represents the storage area used for the
running framework. But that also has issues because we
I changed the subject of the chain also, it was (no subject) before :)
We could provide some UUID that represents the storage area used for the
running framework. But that also has issues because we allow multiple
instances to be run out of the same read-only storage area. But I could
see
From: Thomas Watson/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
To: Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
Date: 2014/10/30 10:11
Subject:Re: [equinox-dev] persistently identify a container
Sent by:equinox-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
I changed the subject of the chain also
@eclipse.org
Date: 10/30/2014 09:24 AM
Subject:Re: [equinox-dev] persistently identify a container
Sent by:equinox-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
I think this is in the problem space of RFC 183.
https://github.com/osgi/design/raw/master/rfcs/rfc0183/rfc-0183-CloudEcosystems.pdf
--
BJ
