On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Brendan Eich wrote:
> In light of the incubation argument and big-ticket items, I don't think value
> proxies break our complexity budget but they are very new. They're unlikely
> to get into ES6. Let's keep discussing here and working on the wiki as
> interest
Mark's reply is good. Another point: we incubate strawman proposals for
indefinite future editions, we do not prematurely cut because something doesn't
fit in ES6. So the strawmay count does not indicate language complexity in the
next edition.
Also, bean-counting lots of little API wins of the
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Erik Corry wrote:
> 2011/1/10 thaddee yann tyl :
> > I see no reason to name the "floordiv" trap that way. Python has a
>
> Agreed.
>
> On a slightly more high level note it seems like there is a very large
> number of complex proposals being poured into Harmony.
?Well, you could implement BigNums with this proposal. You just need to make
the assumption the browser use int32 to store integer numbers smaller than
the max limit. Then, you build up an array that represent the big number,
where arr[0] is its part from 0 to 2^32-1, arr[1] its part (=the bytes
2011/1/10 thaddee yann tyl :
> I see no reason to name the "floordiv" trap that way. Python has a
Agreed.
On a slightly more high level note it seems like there is a very large
number of complex proposals being poured into Harmony. If they are
all implemented the language will become unwieldy an
5 matches
Mail list logo
