On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.com wrote:
Anyway, we your faithful TC39ers will take this up with Ecma people.
That sounds great!
It has been an issue recently with W3C too, where tan...@mozilla.com has been
championing CC0.
FWIW, rationale for this basically
As many of you hopefully know, we're trying to nail down the design of
promises in JavaScript so we can declare consensus on it and start
shipping it in implementations. If you're interested in the
particulars I strongly recommend reading through
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
As many of you hopefully know, we're trying to nail down the design of
promises in JavaScript so we can declare consensus on it and start
shipping it in implementations. If you're interested in the
particulars I strongly
An interesting proposal, but I'm not yet sold. Here are some of the issue I see:
1) By newing a function an ES programmer is expressing a clear intent to use
the body the body of the function as part of the instantiation process. It
would be counter intuitive to not execute the body of a
On Sep 1, 2013, at 7:42 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:
...
Ambiguity is not a matter of preference. We need to validate the ES6 grammar.
Until then, please put back the NoIn productions. They were not there only
because of the silly and unwanted initialiser option for 'for (var x = y of
z)'.
Allen Wirfs-Brock mailto:al...@wirfs-brock.com
September 3, 2013 10:45 AM
Yup, we went off-track on this at the meeting. But Waldemar's point
about arrow functions is still valid. We are going to need to have
ArrowFunctionNoIn to disallow things like:
for (f = x = x in foo;;)
For sure.
var x = if (condition) a; else b;
var y = {let x = m; let y = n; x+2*y;}
Why does JavaScript don't support these?
---
To Ecma International: Release the ECMAScript specification under Creative
Commons Attribution 1.0+ / Open Web Foundation License 0.8+
Because make it look like Java was the rule, and what you propose will
break compatibility with unminified semicolon-free code that would be
minified by a syntax-aware minifier to insert semicolons.
I 3 Algol 68 too, but please work on higher priorities.
/be
musicdenotat...@gmail.com
Hi, I'm back. Not sure I totally figured it out, but I thought it was probably
time to yield my reasoning before iterating further ;-)
To achieve a different result, I figured out we probably needed to start from a
different sets of initial assumptions. So here are my new set of assumptions:
9 matches
Mail list logo
