Re: Re: Current module path

> > > we should have some concrete examples in about a week, in the meantime, > here are the "informal" notes from the breakout session about modules (from > two days ago): > https://gist.github.com/caridy/eefb9b104874465d4e1c > Thank you for providing this link. I see several names that I do not

Re: A reprieve for ES6 comprehensions

Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Andy Wingo wrote: > 1: Essential differences > == > > Array comprehensions are eager. Generator comprehensions are lazy. > Array comprehensions desugar into a do expression à la ES7. Generator > comprehensions desugar into an IIGFE (i

Re: A reprieve for ES6 comprehensions

On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Andy Wingo wrote: > 1: Essential differences > == > > Array comprehensions are eager. Generator comprehensions are lazy. > Array comprehensions desugar into a do expression à la ES7. Generator > comprehensions desugar into an IIGFE (immediately-invoked generator >

Re: Re: Current module path

you will be able to access `name` and `address`, as well as importing relative modules (on demand). we should have some concrete examples in about a week, in the meantime, here are the "informal" notes from the breakout session about modules (from two days ago): https://gist.github.com/caridy/eefb

Re: My ECMAScript 7 wishlist

Interesting bug, thanks for the info. In such case the only concern would be why `Object.prototype` is considered but not inherited properties too. If inheritance should be considered, I'd rather go like this: ``` var NoSuchProperty = Proxy({}, { get: function(target, name, receiver) { whi

Re: Basic set operations?

Yup, a generic collection API. On Jun 7, 2014 7:10 PM, "Calvin Metcalf" wrote: > If you would like to help write a library for them > > https://github.com/calvinmetcalf/set.up > > Another idea would be a generic collections API for maps, sets, arrays, > and other types of collections down the lin

Re: Basic set operations?

If you would like to help write a library for them https://github.com/calvinmetcalf/set.up Another idea would be a generic collections API for maps, sets, arrays, and other types of collections down the line like queues, trees, tries, etc On Jun 7, 2014 3:13 PM, "Barronville, Jonathan" wrote: >

Re: Basic set operations?

Yes ... +++1. - Jonathan — Sent from Mailbox On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Hemanth H.M wrote: > Would it be useful to implement basic set operations as below? > * merge > * subset? > * superset? > * union > * intersection > * complements > * difference > * cartesian > * copy > So on

Basic set operations?

Would it be useful to implement basic set operations as below? * merge * subset? * superset? * union * intersection * complements * difference * cartesian * copy So on? -- *'I am what I am because of who we all are'* h3manth.com *-- Hemanth HM * __

Re: My ECMAScript 7 wishlist

that `has:()=>true` breaks with features detections that are meant to be less obtrusive than getters ... i.e. `'geolocation' in navigator` or `'innerHTML' in genericNode` and all others that are not supposed to pass through a potentially expensive getter to retrieve a feature detection purpose inf