My anecdotal data point is I use Netbeans to build my javascript 3D engine, all
in modules (where each module is a single class where the class definition is
the default export.). This works really well for me, the only problem being the
regular nature of the language problems. Hundreds of
On 6/28/19 8:41 AM, Isiah Meadows wrote:
Currently, the production `a+ +b` requires a space to disambiguate it from the
increment operator. However, `a++b` is not itself valid, as the postfix
increment cannot be immediately followed by a bare identifier on the same line,
nor can a prefix
Personally I would reserve the `a ++ b` pattern for some future semantics
for an infix version of the `++` operator, if anyone ever comes up with one.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 12:37 PM guest271314 wrote:
> > But more importantly, there is no point into searching for a solution
> unless there is
> But more importantly, there is no point into searching for a solution
unless there is a problem. What is the problem with that space?
Agree. The only applicable context which can fathom where the existence of
a space character or not in source code would be golf.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 5:38
i agree vim is efficient for switching between existing files/buffers. but
*opening* new files is a PITA, which subtly affects programming-behavior of
its users -- towards javascript-programming tending less towards
fragmenting code with multiple files/modules (and more towards
code-locality).
I would agree for Vim in its basic form but have successfully used vim, for
several years, with the Ctrl+P extension to quickly and efficiently get
around codebases with many files. It also has a buffer lookup for accessing
already open files, and other shortcuts like Ctrl+B/Ctrl+6 make switching
3 frontend-devs is reasonable and maybe ideal -- but reality is most shops
can only afford 1 frontend-dev. i remain convinced 5 js-devs is around the
practical limit for most products. going over that magic-number, and
people become confused about their areas-of-responsibility -- allowing
As much as I like vim, this seems like more of an argument against using
vim than anything for the language - also it's not "usually" just 1
frontend developer; altho that may be your experience. I often like to say
it's *never* just one - even if it's you, it's also "you in 6 months", and
that
> Le 28 juin 2019 à 19:03, guest271314 a écrit :
>
> Reversing the order does not require a space character
>
> ```
> +b+a
> ```
If you have `+a + +b`, reversing order is not interesting.
But more importantly, there is no point into searching for a solution unless
there is a problem. What
Reversing the order does not require a space character
```
+b+a
```
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 3:42 PM Isiah Meadows
wrote:
> Currently, the production `a+ +b` requires a space to disambiguate it from
> the increment operator. However, `a++b` is not itself valid, as the postfix
> increment cannot
adding a datapoint on effects of vim-editor on my javascript coding-style.
this is to expand on discussion of "JavaScript and Syntax Research Methods"
in tc39-notes [1].
vim has the following file-editing properties:
1. poor UX in opening new files
2. efficient content-search/jump/traversal of
> Le 28 juin 2019 à 17:41, Isiah Meadows a écrit :
>
> Currently, the production `a+ +b` requires a space to disambiguate it from
> the increment operator. However, `a++b` is not itself valid, as the postfix
> increment cannot be immediately followed by a bare identifier on the same
> line,
Why would you need it, there should not be need to type the second + as if
the first is number it will be added anyway.
-- Původní zpráva --
Od: Isiah Meadows
Datum: 28. 6. 2019 v 17:44:35
Předmět: Removing the space in `a+ +b`?
Currently, the production `a+ +b` requires a space
Currently, the production `a+ +b` requires a space to disambiguate it from
the increment operator. However, `a++b` is not itself valid, as the postfix
increment cannot be immediately followed by a bare identifier on the same
line, nor can a prefix operator be preceded by one on the same line.
Note: the wildcard syntax `?.foo` would itself not require this. It'd
require a space after the `?` in ternaries if the Elvis operator proposal
`a ?? b` comes along (and a grammatical edit isn't made to clarify `??.`
gets parsed as `? ?.`), but it would not otherwise be ambiguous.
On Fri, Jun 28,
If missing, the expectation is that it's return `undefined` just like how
`a.foo` returns `undefined` if `a` has no property `"foo"`. It's just
shorthand for `x => x.foo` and similar.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 20:30 guest271314 wrote:
> How can the Selector/Select Expression be used with
>
Agreed in that it's not ambiguous - you have to disambiguate it with a
space for the same reason you have to use `a+ +b` instead of `a++b` in
minified code to avoid ambiguity when specifying `a + +b`. So `a?.b:.c`
would be invalid, but `a? .b:.c` is not.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 16:48 Bob Myers
17 matches
Mail list logo
