to and it doesn't seem to claim to.
Is that right Shanjian?
Is there nothing that mitigates quoting confusion in this proposal?
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Shanjian Li shanj...@google.com
wrote:
EcmaScript lacks a method to format strings in a flexible and
controllable
manner. Most EcmaScript
Comment inline.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Lasse Reichstein
reichsteinatw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 01:21:09 +0100, Shanjian Li shanj...@google.com
wrote:
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:string_format_take_two
Please kindly review the proposal and let
a
hidden toNumber().
shanjian
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:48 AM, P T Withington p...@pobox.com wrote:
On 2011-03-09, at 13:20, Shanjian Li wrote:
It doesn't specify how to print objects, except for %s, which says that
if
the argument is not
a string, convert it to string using .toString
I like this idea. I thought a lot about how to support those locale
specific stuff like plural and gender. Your suggestion provide an elegant
way to transfer the responsibility to a more appropriate party.
shanjian
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Bob Nystrom rnyst...@google.com wrote:
It
)
Also, it doesn't require mundane fixes later on and keeps things
simple for the developer. (No needed knowledge or maintenance of
things based on position.)
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 15:36, Shanjian Li shanj...@google.com wrote:
I like this idea. I thought a lot about how to support those
EcmaScript lacks a method to format strings in a flexible and controllable
manner. Most EcmaScript strings are constructed by concatenating a series of
substrings. Such practice really hurts code readability. Especially for
localization, it is almost impossible to translate the string when it is
6 matches
Mail list logo
