On 10/17/14, 16:13, Jeff Walden wrote:
On 10/17/2014 01:53 PM, Erik Arvidsson wrote:
[1] Microsoft Outlook Calendar web app (part of Exchange Outlook Web Access)
Microsoft could ship a fix in a point release, right? They surely already
provide security patches that admins must install anyway
Katelyn Gadd wrote:
Has the C# approach to namespace extension been considered at all?
Yes. ES4 has namespaces, after Common Lisp symbol packages.
Scoped object extensions were proposed four years ago for ES6, but
foundered on the same thing that killed ES4 namespaces: adding a second
lookup
Has the C# approach to namespace extension been considered at all?
With extension methods (one of the foundational primitives used to
implement their LINQ querying system) they address this by making
extension namespaces 'opt-in' - extension methods are only 'available'
on an object if you've impor
On Sun 19 Oct 2014 02:46, Fabrício Matté writes:
> But in reality, many developers simply won't follow the best practices,
> and as Domenic said, browser vendors don't want to ship changes that
> break existing code.
>
> Looks like we have reached a stalemate, and I believe this is something
> th
@Benjamin
Not sure if I understand what you mean.
If standards don't "dictate", then how are we supposed to expect
interoperable implementations?
By "impossible" I suspect you mean something that browser vendors should
never do. I understand back-compatibility with the Web is a must for
browser
Just as a note - I think that if we learned anything in this regard it's that
standards should guide and not dictate.
It׳s rather impossible to break reasonable user level code and I don't think
it's reasonable to expect developers to be fortune tellers :)
(I like the idea though)
> On Oct 19
Here is a related Twitter discussion:
https://twitter.com/domenic/status/523202298466418688
To highlight the main points:
> Domenic Denicola claims that extending built-in prototypes is not
web-compatible.
Indeed, if we consider all possible corner-cases and ignore best practices
(which is often
Here is some more info.
http://windowssystemspecialist.blogspot.com/2014/10/fixing-blank-calendar-with-chrome-38.html
(This blog post would have been useful when we tracked down what caused OWA
to fail.)
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Jeff Walden wrote:
> On 10/17/2014 01:53 PM, Erik Arvidss
On 10/17/2014 01:53 PM, Erik Arvidsson wrote:
> [1] Microsoft Outlook Calendar web app (part of Exchange Outlook Web Access)
Microsoft could ship a fix in a point release, right? They surely already
provide security patches that admins must install anyway, if they want to keep
their users (and
We learnt this the hard way.
There are pages [1] out there that check if `"values" in object` and now
that ends up being true for Array instances.
[1] Microsoft Outlook Calendar web app (part of Exchange Outlook Web Access)
--
erik
___
es-discuss mail
10 matches
Mail list logo
