Re: Making the identifier identification strawman less restrictive

2013-10-22 Thread Mathias Bynens
On 14 Oct 2013, at 23:21, Erik Arvidsson erik.arvids...@gmail.com wrote: I'm concerned about the latest version of this on the wiki. The edition parameter requires that we ship 2 tables today. This seems like it might change to 3 in ES7 and n in ES(n+4). I think the only reasonable

Re: Making the identifier identification strawman less restrictive

2013-10-14 Thread Erik Arvidsson
Haverbeke mari...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Making the identifier identification strawman less restrictive Date: 10 October 2013 11:13:34 CEST To: Norbert Lindenberg ecmascr...@lindenbergsoftware.com Cc: Mathias Bynens math...@qiwi.be, es-discuss es-discuss@mozilla.org, Anton Kovalyov an...@kovalyov.net

Re: Making the identifier identification strawman less restrictive

2013-10-14 Thread Brendan Eich
Erik Arvidsson wrote: I'm concerned about the latest version of this on the wiki. The edition parameter requires that we ship 2 tablestoday. This seems like it might change to 3 in ES7 and n in ES(n+4). I think the only reasonable requirement is that it matches what the engine actually uses.

Fwd: Making the identifier identification strawman less restrictive

2013-10-11 Thread Mathias Bynens
Forwarding Marijn’s message since he’s not subscribed to es-discuss. Begin forwarded message: From: Marijn Haverbeke mari...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Making the identifier identification strawman less restrictive Date: 10 October 2013 11:13:34 CEST To: Norbert Lindenberg ecmascr

Fwd: Making the identifier identification strawman less restrictive

2013-10-10 Thread Mathias Bynens
Forwarding Anton’s message since he’s not subscribed to es-discuss. Begin forwarded message: From: Anton Kovalyov an...@kovalyov.net Subject: Re: Making the identifier identification strawman less restrictive Date: 9 October 2013 22:17:50 CEST To: Mathias Bynens math...@qiwi.be Cc: Norbert

Re: Making the identifier identification strawman less restrictive

2013-10-09 Thread Mathias Bynens
CC’ing the creators of the tools we’ve been talking about to get their input. Hi guys! Please start reading here: http://esdiscuss.org/topic/making-the-identifier-identification-strawman-less-restrictive. On 9 Oct 2013, at 07:48, Norbert Lindenberg ecmascr...@lindenbergsoftware.com wrote

Re: Making the identifier identification strawman less restrictive

2013-10-09 Thread Norbert Lindenberg
On Oct 9, 2013, at 0:27 , Mathias Bynens math...@qiwi.be wrote: - Step 11 would allow all Unicode code points that are matched by the IdentifierStart production, including supplementary code points, which ES 5 does not permit in identifiers. (Note that Unicode 3.0, the version referenced

Making the identifier identification strawman less restrictive

2013-10-06 Thread Mathias Bynens
This is about the identifier identification strawman: http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:identifier_identification For tooling, it’s better to have a false positive than to have a false negative. In the case of identifier identification, it’s more useful to flag an identifier that