> On Nov 26, 2015, at 12:20 AM, Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
>
> I realize that this is nit-picky, but the name `RequireObjectCoercible` feels
> wrong (and not intention-revealing) in the following context (which is not
> about objects at all):
>
> 1. Let O be ?
I realize that this is nit-picky, but the name `RequireObjectCoercible` feels
wrong (and not intention-revealing) in the following context (which is not
about objects at all):
1. Let O be ? RequireObjectCoercible(`this` value).
2. Let S be ? ToString(O).
Something like `RequireActualValue` or
2 matches
Mail list logo