(For the history of this thread to refer to it later)
At the meeting it was decided not to remove `keys()` and `entries()`, and
keep the `(value, againValue, set)` callback params signature.
The reasons:
- Consistency with maps and to reuse callbacks from arrays;
- Even if it may seem a wrong
Are we OK with this? Seems like removing `entries`, `keys` and providing own
default `@@iterator` for `Set` which should be just `values()` would make it
more sense from the abstraction usage perspective.
W.r.t. your last suggestion: that’s how the spec does it. Anything else would
Removing Set.prototype.entries and Set.prototype.keys might make sense. I'm
not really sure why we added them. Probably for consistency.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Axel Rauschmayer a...@rauschma.de wrote:
Are we OK with this? Seems like removing `entries`, `keys` and providing
own
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Axel Rauschmayer a...@rauschma.de wrote:
Are we OK with this? Seems like removing `entries`, `keys` and providing
own default `@@iterator` for `Set` which should be just `values()` would
make it more sense from the abstraction usage perspective.
W.r.t. your
From: Brendan Eich [mailto:bren...@mozilla.org]
Domenic Denicola wrote:
That said, Set is shipping in every major browser so it's not going to
get fixed now.
Why do you say that?
I would guess that, via the usual `if (!window.Set) { window.Set = ... }`
polyfills , there is a nontrivial
An old discussion. See:
https://esdiscuss.org/topic/set-and-map-additions-in-the-latest-draft
https://esdiscuss.org/notes/2012-07-26 (section heading: Map and Set methods:
conclusion)
https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591
Allen
On Oct 10, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Rick Waldron wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com
wrote:
An old discussion. See:
https://esdiscuss.org/topic/set-and-map-additions-in-the-latest-draft
https://esdiscuss.org/notes/2012-07-26 (section heading: Map and Set
methods: conclusion)
From: es-discuss [mailto:es-discuss-boun...@mozilla.org] On Behalf Of Allen
Wirfs-Brock
An old discussion. See:
These only address the `forEach` method though, and not the strange design of
`entries()`, `values()`, and `keys()`. I guess a reusability argument could be
made, but it seems
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Domenic Denicola
dome...@domenicdenicola.com wrote:
From: es-discuss [mailto:es-discuss-boun...@mozilla.org] On Behalf Of
Allen Wirfs-Brock
An old discussion. See:
These only address the `forEach` method though, and not the strange design
of `entries()`,
On Monday, October 13, 2014, Domenic Denicola dome...@domenicdenicola.com
wrote:
From: es-discuss [mailto:es-discuss-boun...@mozilla.org javascript:;]
On Behalf Of Allen Wirfs-Brock
An old discussion. See:
These only address the `forEach` method though, and not the strange design
of
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Monday, October 13, 2014, Domenic Denicola dome...@domenicdenicola.com
wrote:
From: es-discuss [mailto:es-discuss-boun...@mozilla.org] On Behalf Of
Allen Wirfs-Brock
An old discussion. See:
These only
Hi,
(sorry I again probably too late, if the API is already locked, very likely
it has been discussed and approved, please let me know)
The API of `Set`s seems in inconvenient way exposes things that relates
only to implementation details, but which doesn't make big sense at
abstraction usage
18:56
To: es-discussmailto:es-discuss@mozilla.org
Subject: Set API
Hi,
(sorry I again probably too late, if the API is already locked, very likely it
has been discussed and approved, please let me know)
The API of `Set`s seems in inconvenient way exposes things that relates only
Domenic Denicola wrote:
That said, Set is shipping in every major browser so it's not going to
get fixed now.
Why do you say that?
/be
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.org wrote:
Domenic Denicola wrote:
That said, Set is shipping in every major browser so it's not going to
get fixed now.
Why do you say that?
Yeah, since the spec normally changes in some small parts, as e.g. with
recent
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Friday, October 10, 2014, Dmitry Soshnikov dmitry.soshni...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
(sorry I again probably too late, if the API is already locked, very
likely it has been discussed and approved, please let me
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Dmitry Soshnikov
dmitry.soshni...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.org wrote:
Domenic Denicola wrote:
That said, Set is shipping in every major browser so it's not going to
get fixed now.
Why do you say that?
On Friday, October 10, 2014, Dmitry Soshnikov dmitry.soshni...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.org
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bren...@mozilla.org'); wrote:
Domenic Denicola wrote:
That said, Set is shipping in every major browser so it's not
18 matches
Mail list logo
