On Dec 19, 2007 9:38 PM, Brendan Eich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 19, 2007, at 9:16 PM, Peter Michaux wrote:
>
> With so many ECMAScript engines rushing ahead to implement the ES4
> proposal, it seems as though the proposal is as good as approved.
>
> No, and I wonder if you missed my r
On Dec 19, 2007, at 9:16 PM, Peter Michaux wrote:
With so many ECMAScript engines rushing ahead to implement the ES4
proposal, it seems as though the proposal is as good as approved.
No, and I wonder if you missed my reply to your comment in John
Resig's blog:
http://ejohn.org/blog/state-o
With so many ECMAScript engines rushing ahead to implement the ES4
proposal, it seems as though the proposal is as good as approved.
Perhaps there will be minor tweaks but if so many implementations
contain classes, for example, such a feature will almost certainly be
in ES4 final.
Has the voting
ES4 proposals include making regexes callable as a function on a single string
argument, which serves as a shorthand for calling the regex's exec method. To
further extend this idea, what about also including call and apply methods on
RegExp.prototype, so that regexes can more easily be used wit
Is this permitted syntax in a constructor:
super.apply(this, arguments);
for the case where I want to pass all my arguments to my superclass
constructor? If not, how does one do that, especially if the
constructor I am calling from takes a ...rest arg?
