I've posted an updated ES4 grammar in the usual place:
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=proposals:normative_grammar
Comments welcomed.
Jd
___
Es4-discuss mailing list
Es4-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=proposals:normative_grammar
I've updated this grammar to address comments I received on the 03-Apr-2008
revision. As always see the Revision History to see what has changed.
Jd
___
Es4-discuss mailing list
On 4/18/08 8:06 AM, Jeff Dyer wrote:
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=proposals:normative_grammar
I've updated this grammar to address comments I received on the 03-Apr-2008
revision. As always see the Revision History to see what has changed.
Another quick update posted:
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Orendorff
Sent: 2. april 2008 13:46
To: Jeff Dyer
Cc: es4-discuss
Subject: Re: grammar update
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Jeff Dyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've updated the ES4 grammar files linked from
http
On Apr 2, 2008, at 1:03 PM, Lars Hansen wrote:
Looks like those restrictions (condition only at the end, only 'for',
'for each',
and 'if' clauses) originate in Brendan's original (too-sketchy)
proposal, see
the Comprehensions section of this page:
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?
-Original Message-
From: Brendan Eich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2. april 2008 17:15
To: Lars Hansen
Cc: Jason Orendorff; Jeff Dyer; es4-discuss
Subject: Re: grammar update
On Apr 2, 2008, at 1:03 PM, Lars Hansen wrote:
Looks like those restrictions (condition only
On Apr 2, 2008, at 6:01 PM, Lars Hansen wrote:
This is all thin syntactic sugar, so I don't agree it rocks
the boat too much to follow the full prototype in Python.
I'll update the proposal, since it claims to follow the PEP,
but fails since the PEP cites the RM.
The PEP is scarcely
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: grammar update
Page 11
FunctionDeclaration ::= function FunctionName FunctionSignature
should be
FunctionDeclarationW ::= function FunctionName FunctionSignature SemicolonW
following statement:
type function() like AAA
:35 PM
Subject: Re: grammar update
Page 11
FunctionDeclaration ::= function FunctionName FunctionSignature
should be
FunctionDeclarationW ::= function FunctionName FunctionSignature SemicolonW
following statement:
type function() like AAA
Should it be:
RelationalExpression like
Hi,
Does the order of rules means different priority? otherwise why
PropertyName is same as PrimaryName, and what is that number before
each rule means?
Regards
Eric Suen
___
Es4-discuss mailing list
Es4-discuss@mozilla.org
On 3/31/08 10:33 AM, Lars Hansen wrote:
I disagree that 'enum' should be reserved in ES4. E262-3 ch 16 is
explicit in allowing syntactic extensions and it appears that Opera and
Firefox do not reserve 'enum', suggesting that 'enum' is not in use on
the public web.
I don't remember why we
On Mar 31, 2008, at 1:24 PM, Jeff Dyer wrote:
On 3/31/08 10:33 AM, Lars Hansen wrote:
I disagree that 'enum' should be reserved in ES4. E262-3 ch 16 is
explicit in allowing syntactic extensions and it appears that
Opera and
Firefox do not reserve 'enum', suggesting that 'enum' is not in
Hi,
I've updated the ES4 grammar files linked from
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=proposals:normative_grammar
This version is my best attempt to describe the syntax of the language that
the ES4 working group is converging on. This convergence is reflected in the
feature spreadsheet
Subject: grammar update
Hi,
I've updated the ES4 grammar files linked from
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=proposals:normative_grammar
This version is my best attempt to describe the syntax of the
language that the ES4 working group is converging on. This
convergence
.
If 'has' is contextually reserved then so is 'invoke'.
--lars
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Dyer
Sent: 30. mars 2008 18:30
To: es4-discuss
Subject: grammar update
Hi,
I've updated the ES4 grammar files linked from
On 3/30/08, Jeff Dyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've updated the ES4 grammar files linked from
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=proposals:normative_grammar
Thanks, Jeff.
- Allowing splat expressions in array literals is a nice addition, but
restricting them to the end of element
- Allowing splat expressions in array literals is a nice addition, but
restricting them to the end of element lists seems unnecessary. Is
the purpose uniformity between array literals and array patterns?
Almost: uniformity between array literals and function calls. But
another issue was
17 matches
Mail list logo