Re: [etherlab-users] Transition from PREOP to SAFEOP sloooooow

me it seems, 400 slaves is a lot and as they do not switch all at the same time, but more one after the other, the number of slaves has a direct impact on the amount of time it takes to come up. Which kind of slaves are theese, btw? Greets, Erwin -- Erwin Burgs

Re: [etherlab-users] Transition from PREOP to SAFEOP sloooooow

o speed this up? Maybe change the design of your application. ;-) But as we don't know what the purpose is, it's difficult to give any advice. > Any hints appreciated. Is it possible to use more than one NIC? Regards, Erwin -- Erwin Burgstaller __

Re: [etherlab-users] Kernel question

Hi, * Wed, May 11, 2011 - 08:48:33 +, Kaashoek I. Irene - irene.kaash...@tno.nl: > My suggestion to solve the problems would be to compile another preempt > kernel, kernel 2.6.29 and then use the master and driver files from Erwin > Burgstaller. Then I would perhaps need

Re: [etherlab-users] Kernel question

g swallowed by spamgourmet, probably have been sent to me directly. This spamgourmet address accepts mails to the lists only. If you like to create an account on dropbox.com, please use this URL: http://db.tt/w1WnJqb ;-) -- Erwin Burgstaller ___ etherl

Re: [etherlab-users] EoE in user or kernel space ?

MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:94 errors:38 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:45 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:7851 (7.6 KiB) TX bytes:3102 (3.0 KiB) -- Erwin Burgstaller _

Re: [etherlab-users] EtherCat-Master

We're successfully running in production, kernel version 2.6.29 with ECMaster version 1.5. We're using the Intel 82573L Gigabit Ethernet Controller (e1000e), with a little trick. I've already posted on this list how it works, I think, could be the developers list though. ;)

Re: [etherlab-users] Beckhoff Serial-port module EL6002 reading slow

would be very helpful. You have to do the configuration with sdo requests. See documentation for ecrt_slave_config_create_sdo_request(), ecrt_sdo_request_write(), ecrt_sdo_request_state(), etc. -- Erwin Burgstaller ___ etherlab-users mailing list

Re: [etherlab-users] Adapter card to run master on a laptop?

* Fri, Apr 16, 2010 - 08:54:07 -0700, Aaron Edsinger - edsin...@mekabot.com: > Hello. Can anyone recommend an Express adapter card with one of the > supported EtherLab EtherCat master chipsets? We'd like to run our > system off a laptop. Thanks. > --Aaron Any Card with an e1000 or e1000e chipset o

Re: [etherlab-users] Kernel question

to e1000. In terms of the current version (1.5?), I've found it doesn't run stable. EoE doesn't work, the box crashes within 15 up to 30 seconds if a EoE enabled device is on the bus and I had some problems in releasing the master, also with EoE enabled. Without EoE it seems to w

Re: [etherlab-users] callbacks with CoE

more. But you could just take the rtai example which comes with the masters source code. Yours should just work pretty exactly that way. Regards, Erwin -- Erwin Burgstaller ___ etherlab-users mailing list etherlab-users@etherlab.org http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users

Re: [etherlab-users] Timeout while waiting for Sdo upload response

settings on serial the interface of that devices, which is 9600n81, as setting the configuration works mostly but not all the time, but we need it at 100%. As there are plans for using scanners which have to run at least with 115200 Baud, this will be a severe problem. Thanks, Erwin -- Erwin

Re: [etherlab-users] Timeout while waiting for Sdo upload response

* Mon, Oct 20, 2008 - 17:44:25 +0200, Florian Pose - f...@igh-essen.com: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 04:19:28PM +0200, Erwin Burgstaller wrote: > > > If I understood you right, the only timeout problems happen in context > > > of Sdo requests, is this correct? > > > &

[etherlab-users] Link down: Hardly to recognize

ating normal, but it would be much better, if at least the slaves states are shown as OFFLINE or something like that. Unloading and reloading the realtime module works surprisingly too and just for simple digital IO's there's no difference in having

[etherlab-users] EoE: Malformed packets on position 1

her EoE operations seems not to be affected, but as it looks like a bug, it might do. Regards, Erwin -- Erwin Burgstaller ___ etherlab-users mailing list etherlab-users@etherlab.org http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users

Re: [etherlab-users] EC kernel driver changes upstream merge?

nse and is it easily possible? > Was there such an attempt already, and if yes, did the kernel > maintainers have any objections or suggestions? The ec_* network driver modules do not work without the EtherCAT master loaded. So the master itself would have to be part of the kernel fir

Re: [etherlab-users] [etherlab users] Kernel Panic in EoE context

ow helpful though. Erwin -- Erwin Burgstaller ___ etherlab-users mailing list etherlab-users@etherlab.org http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users

[etherlab-users] Kernel Panic in EoE context

ded again. Any ideas for what we could do, to track down the problem? Any help would be appreciated, Erwin -- Erwin Burgstaller [ 906.321421] KEC::kecrtai: Domain0: State 2. [ 906.328251] EtherCAT: eoe0s0 stopped. [ 906.386080] EtherCAT: Scanning bus. [ 906.409061] EtherCAT WARNIN

Re: [etherlab-users] Device gets stuck in state "INIT E"

.htm But everything on the controller board will be integrated on the main board soon. Thanks for your help, Erwin -- Erwin Burgstaller ___ etherlab-users mailing list etherlab-users@etherlab.org http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users

Re: [etherlab-users] UNMATCHED and SKIPPED datagrams

is called every loop of course. Thanks for your help, Erwin -- Erwin Burgstaller ___ etherlab-users mailing list etherlab-users@etherlab.org http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users

[etherlab-users] Device gets stuck in state "INIT E"

ng seems to be not very time consuming, but a call back function for state changes would be nice, don't beat me if it's already there. ;-) Thanks a lot, Erwin BTW: Is there an answer for my last question in "UNMATCHED and SKIPPED datagrams"? ^^ -- Erwin

Re: [etherlab-users] UNMATCHED and SKIPPED datagrams

ed for several hours? Or could there be a problem in the masters datagram queue? Thanks, Erwin -- Erwin Burgstaller ___ etherlab-users mailing list etherlab-users@etherlab.org http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users

Re: [etherlab-users] Ethernet and EtherCAT with same type of NIC

sure, cause I've added a rule, so /dev/EtherCAT has Permission 644 instead of 600, and that works. So I have to find the right udev rule, I suppose. ;-) Thanks, Erwin -- Erwin Burgstaller ___ etherlab-users mailing list etherlab-users@eth

Re: [etherlab-users] UNMATCHED and SKIPPED datagrams

ion. If this is your > own slave, please check, if there are valid data in the SII. It is, so we'll check. Thanks, Erwin -- Erwin Burgstaller ___ etherlab-users mailing list etherlab-users@etherlab.org http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users

[etherlab-users] Ethernet and EtherCAT with same type of NIC

way, but by using ec_* exclusively there's at least no broken Ethernet while boot process. Anyway, I think both this methods aren't very cool, so how could this problem solved in a better way? Thanks, Erwin -- Erwin Burgstaller ___

[etherlab-users] UNMATCHED and SKIPPED datagrams

bly we've a transfer protocol similar to that the Beckhoff EL6001 uses. I'll attach this last part of the syslog compressed with gzip, as it's the whole run up of that two slaves with debug=1. There's another strange warning in there, but maybe harmless: EtherCAT WARNING: Unk

Re: [etherlab-users] memory leakage of Master 1.4.0-rc3

0 180712 137532 -/+ buffers/cache: 138872 376748 Swap: 995984212 995772 Free memory is 376748 KB referring the line starting with +/-, where the use of memory for buffers and cache already is recalculated. -- Erwin

Re: [etherlab-users] memory leakage of Master 1.4.0-rc3

hat makes you sure it's from the master module? Can you describe your application? Do you have EoE running? -- Erwin Burgstaller ___ etherlab-users mailing list etherlab-users@etherlab.org http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users

Re: [etherlab-users] RTL8168

lab Master to support more than just one currently available NIC, the e1000 based ones. Greets, Erwin -- Erwin Burgstaller ___ etherlab-users mailing list etherlab-users@etherlab.org http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users

Re: [etherlab-users] RTL8168

ources of the "IgH EtherCAT Master". Would you be so kind to send it in the meanwhile to me? I would have to port it to 2.6.22 anyway. ;-) Thanks in advance, Erwin -- Erwin Burgstaller ___ etherlab-users mailing list etherlab-us

Re: [etherlab-users] XML for rtai_sample ?

* Thu, Nov 06, 2008 - 08:26:15 -0500, Joe Brandt - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Does anyone have the xml from a slave configured to run > with the rtai_sample (1.4-rc4) ? As I can see, the sample expects 2 devices: Beckhoff EL2004 and EL3162. Which devices do you have? Regards, Erwin --

Re: [etherlab-users] Ethernet over EtherCAT: IP-Address

s it's ring position, we'll let it build it's ip-address based on that, something like this: 192.168..2 Regards, Erwin -- Erwin Burgstaller smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ etherlab-users mailing list etherl

[etherlab-users] Ethernet over EtherCAT: IP-Address

hould we set the slaves IP-Address? Regards, Erwin -- Erwin Burgstaller smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ etherlab-users mailing list etherlab-users@etherlab.org http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users

Re: [etherlab-users] Licencing EtherCAT Master

module with another license then GPL just marks the the kernel as tainted. Which is something I could live with. ;-) Regards, Erwin -- Erwin Burgstaller ___ etherlab-users mailing list etherlab-users@etherlab.org http://lists.etherlab.org/mailm

Re: [etherlab-users] Timeout while waiting for Sdo upload response

0 11:20:20 UCL00097 kernel: [267036.796248] EtherCAT DEBUG: Slave 14 did no respond to Sdo upload request. Retrying after 2940 ms... O In the second line above, the message has been logged partly. > If I understood you right, the only timeout problems happen in context > of Sdo re

Re: [etherlab-users] Timeout while waiting for Sdo upload response

Hi, * Fri, Oct 10, 2008 - 17:17:38 +0200, Florian Pose - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 11:35:38AM +0200, Erwin Burgstaller wrote: > > No differnce, it's the same. > > Does it make a difference if you increase the I/O timeout in > master/globals.h? Did i

Re: [etherlab-users] Timeout while waiting for Sdo upload response

ab.org/pipermail/etherlab-users/2008/thread.html But there's no link to that page here: http://lists.etherlab.org/pipermail/etherlab-users/ But my mail with the wireshark dumps attached is not there. So if you'll need them, I would send them directly. Thanks, Erwin -- Erwin Bur

Re: [etherlab-users] Timeout while waiting for Sdo upload response

prefix=/ \ --enable-8139too=yes --enable-e1000=yes --enable-debug-if=yes --enable-cycles Thanks, Erwin BTW: Weren't the archives once updated soon after sending the message to the list? -- Erwin Burgstaller ___ etherlab-users mailing li

Re: [etherlab-users] Timeout while waiting for Sdo upload response

of the slave with Beckhoff's support: there's no newer version. I've also tried another EL6001, we've got 2 weeks ago, with the same result. Twincat as well as the command ethercat upload -p1 -tstring 0x100A 0 shows the software version as V00.04 Erwin -- Erwin Burgstaller __

[etherlab-users] Timeout while waiting for Sdo upload response

bit, "Data In 13" Pdo entry 0x3103:10, 8 bit, "Data In 14" Pdo entry 0x3103:11, 8 bit, "Data In 15" Pdo entry 0x3103:12, 8 bit, "Data In 16" Pdo entry 0x3103:13, 8 bit, "Data In 17" Pdo entry 0x3103:14, 8 bit, "Data In 18&