I think your device has full duplex... I found this thread from June,
where the saem device solved someone else's problem:
http://www.tek-tips.com/gviewthread.cfm/lev2/5/lev3/34/pid/585/qid/298846
(search down to "PROBLEM SOLVED!")
Here's another one that implies that it does full-duplex; users ar
Cory Petkovsek wrote:
> 100baseTX: theoretical max speed (half duplex): 100Mb/sec / 8 = 12.5MB/sec
> My laptop ide harddrive (read): 16.45 MB/sec
>
> A single harddrive will be able to handle network traffic in most cases.
The problem is that many real workloads require the disk to seek. If
you
100baseTX: theoretical max speed (half duplex): 100Mb/sec / 8 = 12.5MB/sec
My laptop ide harddrive (read): 16.45 MB/sec
A single harddrive will be able to handle network traffic in most cases.
For a server it should have some sort of raid subsystem with multiple
drives which will allow it to excee
I've also got one of these SMC Barcade routers. Here's the spec sheet on
the thing (can you tell if its full duplex for this?):
<~Beaker
---
*** SMC7004ABR Spec Sheet ***
Ports:
Four 10Base-T/100BaseTX RJ-45 ports (auto-MDIX/MDI)
One 10Base-T/100BaseTX Broadband WAN port
One DB-9 port for P
Right-o! The latest Samba knows about NFS and they should respect each
others' file-locks. You might consider using *only* one or the other,
if you tend toward manic about network traffic; there are only a few
options for doing NFS on windows, though... Samba does the SMB protocol
better than M$
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 08:03:36PM -0700, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 04:41:33PM -0700, Master O Planets wrote:
>
> > file. I guess the most complex file I could think of moving into Linux
> > would be a QuickCAD .dxf file.
>
> QCAD (http://www.qcad.org/) can render .dxf, and I
. Once I have things figured out I can drop windows.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:eug-lug-admin@;efn.org]On Behalf Of
>Cory Petkovsek
>Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 4:19 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [Eug-lug]Networking question from
>
>
> --- Master O Planets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thank you! Which one do you think is better?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:eug-lug-admin@;efn.org]On Behalf Of
> > Mike O
> > Sent: Thu
Which one do you think is better?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:eug-lug-admin@;efn.org]On Behalf Of
> Mike O
> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Eug-lug]Networking que
:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Eug-lug]Networking question from a novice
Master O Planets,
"network directly" means lots of things. They all have tcp/ip stacks
so can all connect to each other to communicate. They need only the
same application protocol, such as ftp, ssh
r?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:eug-lug-admin@;efn.org]On Behalf Of
> Mike O
> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Eug-lug]Networking question f
Master O Planets,
"network directly" means lots of things. They all have tcp/ip stacks
so can all connect to each other to communicate. They need only the
same application protocol, such as ftp, ssh, smb or a variety of others.
If all you want to do is share files then samba(smb) is probably th
Thank you! Which one do you think is better?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:eug-lug-admin@;efn.org]On Behalf Of
Mike O
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Eug-lug]Networking question from a novice
Samba!! Or SSH. Plenty of
Samba!! Or SSH. Plenty of ways.
--- Master O Planets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to know if this is a workable problem.
>
> I want to setup three computers on a network using a
> SMC Barricade router so
> that the final outcome is WinME, Red Hat 7.2, and
> Mandrake 8.2.
>
> Right now I
I need to know if this is a workable problem.
I want to setup three computers on a network using a SMC Barricade router so
that the final outcome is WinME, Red Hat 7.2, and Mandrake 8.2.
Right now I have a box with WinME, a dual boot box with WinME and Red Hat,
and a dual boot box with WinME and
15 matches
Mail list logo
