You mean "in soviet russia Cowboy Neal 0wnz your breasts" and
"goat.??.??"?
Yeah, not everyone is grown up on Slashdot but there is the
occasional insightful (not just one modded as such) post.
--- Jason Van Cleve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But what annoys me most about that site, while we'
I still think most of the commenters on slashdot are perl scripts.
Of course slashdot has reached the peak (or is that nadir) of gutter
journalism, everyone deplores it, but knowing the headlines is
mandatory.
On 6/21/05, perdurabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/21/05, Jason Van Cleve <[EMAIL
On 6/21/05, Jason Van Cleve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm surprised you've time to read /.'s comments at all, considering
> you're likely to find one good thought among twenty pages of cruft.
You have to read the comments on Slashdot, so you'll know how bad /.
got it wrong or mislead you. I wis
Jason Van Cleve wrote:
> Quoth Bob Miller, on Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:50:19 -0700:
>
> > a kernel developer). But the articles and the reader comments are
> > less juvenile than you-know-where. LWN is also much more tightly
>
> I'm surprised you've time to read /.'s comments at all, considering
>
Quoth Bob Miller, on Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:50:19 -0700:
> a kernel developer). But the articles and the reader comments are
> less juvenile than you-know-where. LWN is also much more tightly
I'm surprised you've time to read /.'s comments at all, considering
you're likely to find one good thought
On 6/20/05, Bob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The amateur/reader-created news sites are a lot better at finding and
> printing the really interesting stories. That's because the publisher
> is passionate -- a zealot -- about the subject matter. The price we
> pay is that the content is not
