Glad to hear it!
There has grown up in the minds of certain groups in this country the
notion that because a man or corporation has made a profit out of the
public for a number of years, the government and the courts are charged
with the duty of guaranteeing such profit in the future, even in the
Thanks, especially to the two nights of work by Mike Cherba, and the enjoyable
company of all others (including any and all other Mikes) at the last two
clinics.
My re-wrted WRT is still wrtin as I type this.
JF
-
Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search
Give them to Miller. He can bring them on a Thursday and I'll
make a bookshelf for them to be grabbed off of.
--- Rob Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's clean off the bookshelf time and I have 3 books up for
> grabs...
>
> 1) Programming Perl, 2nd Ed., O'Reilly
> 2) Advanced Perl Programm
On 7/31/07, Ben Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> BTW, Horst, http://passwordsafe.sourceforge.net/ is one of the most common
> password managers,
> to get back to the stated subject.
I second the PWSafe recommendation, assuming you mean the program called
"Password Safe" that was originall
So they've gotta be close on an OS X version, it has apparently been in the
works for a while.
That would be cool. Someone reported that it works fine under Parallels on
OS X, albeit
a bit painful on usability.
BTW, Horst, http://passwordsafe.sourceforge.net/ is one of the most common
password ma
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:48:04 -0700
From: Bob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
horst wrote:
I noticed a few binaries for Suse and Ubuntu, and the source code for
kernel 2.6.5 or better.
Why does an encryption program have a kernel version dependency? It
ought to need nothing more than open, close
On 7/31/07, horst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Alan and Quentin --thanks for the pointer.
Sure thing.
The project looks well thought through and documented, and I like their
> philosophy,
Yeah, these guys are pretty good. I'd say they err a little too far on the
side of caution and end up hu
On 7/31/07, Bob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> horst wrote:
>
> > I noticed a few binaries for Suse and Ubuntu, and the source code for
> > kernel 2.6.5 or better.
>
> Why does an encryption program have a kernel version dependency? It
> ought to need nothing more than open, close, read and
horst wrote:
> I noticed a few binaries for Suse and Ubuntu, and the source code for
> kernel 2.6.5 or better.
Why does an encryption program have a kernel version dependency? It
ought to need nothing more than open, close, read and write.
--
Bob Miller K
Thats wild. You really have to work to be electrocuted by your computer.
On 7/31/07, Mike Cherba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> http://www.shanghaidaily.com/sp/article/2007/200707/20070730/article_325330.htm
>
> "If it wasn't for C, we'd be writing programs in BASI, PASAL, and OBOL."
> --- Unkn
http://www.shanghaidaily.com/sp/article/2007/200707/20070730/article_325330.htm
"If it wasn't for C, we'd be writing programs in BASI, PASAL, and OBOL."
--- Unknown
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
Alan and Quentin --thanks for the pointer.
The project looks well thought through and documented, and I like their
philosophy, quoting from the FAQ section:
"""
Q: Will TrueCrypt be open-source and free forever?
A: Yes, it will. We will never create a commercial version of TrueCrypt,
as we bel
It's clean off the bookshelf time and I have 3 books up for grabs...
1) Programming Perl, 2nd Ed., O'Reilly
2) Advanced Perl Programming, O'Reilly
3) MySQL & mSQL, O'Reilly
-Rob
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/lis
13 matches
Mail list logo
