Patrick R. Wade wrote:
> I gather that Ubuntu consider init to be obsolete and are working on
> migration to a more Apple-like model. There was a story on Digg about
> this recently.
This is probably the article you remember.
http://www.netsplit.com/blog/work/canonical/upstart.html
--
Bob Mil
Garl Grigsby wrote:
> So I start digging. From my poking, I gather that for Ubuntu, there is
> runlevel 1 and runlevel 2-5. 2-5 are all identical. What's the logic
> behind this? I know I can modify this to act more like what I'm used to,
> but I just want to understand the logic behind the all or
Having switched from RedHat to Debian some time ago, I
agree. The RedHat model seems sensible. I just don't
understand why Debian didn't embrace it.
--
Allen Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.peak.org/~abrown/
When you're angry, take a deep breath and count to ten.
When you're really angr
Ok, I guess I need somebody to 'learn me' in the ways of Debian, well
Ubuntu at least.
I've got a box I setup for my kids recently and I thought I'd put Ubuntu
on it. Last night I realized I was running the unaccelerated nvidia
driver. So I went to install the Nvidia binary drivers. After
dow
