Re: [EVDL] eMotorWerks' inline-adapter JuicePlug makes dumb j1772 EVSE smart

2016-03-20 Thread Rush Dougherty via EV
er is pretty intelligent. Rush Dougherty www.TucsonEV.com > -Original Message- > From: EV [mailto:ev-boun...@lists.evdl.org] On Behalf Of Cruisin via EV > Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 5:22 PM > To: ev@lists.evdl.org > Subject: Re: [EVDL] eMotorWerks' inline-adapter J

Re: [EVDL] eMotorWerks' inline-adapter JuicePlug makes dumb j1772 EVSE smart

2016-03-19 Thread Marco Gaxiola via EV
Actually TESLA UMC does not have any UL stamp on it, correct? Marco On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Cor van de Water via EV wrote: > As far as I know, the only thing not "allowed" with the non-UL unit is > that PG&E does not accept your entrance in the rebate program for the smart > charging.

Re: [EVDL] eMotorWerks' inline-adapter JuicePlug makes dumb j1772 EVSE smart

2016-03-19 Thread Cruisin via EV
Don't use it, it is NOT UL approved. Not allowed in Alameda or San Jose County as well as others. -- View this message in context: http://electric-vehicle-discussion-list.413529.n4.nabble.com/eMotorWerks-inline-adapter-JuicePlug-makes-dumb-j1772-EVSE-smart-tp4681030p4681031.html Sent from the Ele

Re: [EVDL] eMotorWerks' inline-adapter JuicePlug makes dumb j1772 EVSE smart

2016-03-19 Thread Cruisin via EV
City and County codes doe not permit the use of any product for EV charging that is not UL approved. This is for every ones safety which I guess you don care about. Beef, you sound like a forum junkie. Maybe in Arizona you don't care about other people. Best you rethink your position on this subjec

Re: [EVDL] eMotorWerks' inline-adapter JuicePlug makes dumb j1772 EVSE smart

2016-03-19 Thread Cor van de Water via EV
As far as I know, the only thing not "allowed" with the non-UL unit is that PG&E does not accept your entrance in the rebate program for the smart charging. If I am not mistaken, EMW has recently succeeded in getting UL listing for the device, so even that argument would no longer hold, but it i

Re: [EVDL] eMotorWerks' inline-adapter JuicePlug makes dumb j1772 EVSE smart

2016-03-19 Thread Rush Dougherty via EV
on AZ 85719 > -Original Message- > From: EV [mailto:ev-boun...@lists.evdl.org] On Behalf Of Cruisin via EV > Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 6:36 AM > To: ev@lists.evdl.org > Subject: Re: [EVDL] eMotorWerks' inline-adapter JuicePlug makes dumb j1772 EVSE > smart >

Re: [EVDL] eMotorWerks' inline-adapter JuicePlug makes dumb j1772 EVSE smart

2016-03-19 Thread Rush Dougherty via EV
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 9:56 PM > To: Electric Vehicle Discussion List > Subject: Re: [EVDL] eMotorWerks' inline-adapter JuicePlug makes dumb j1772 EVSE > smart > > Actually TESLA UMC does not have any UL stamp on it, correct? > > Marco > > On Wed, Mar 16,

Re: [EVDL] eMotorWerks' inline-adapter JuicePlug makes dumb j1772 EVSE smart

2016-03-18 Thread EVDL Administrator via EV
On 17 Mar 2016 at 8:18, Rush Dougherty via EV wrote: > As David R says so often, what you say on the internet stays on the > internet... Yep. I also say: "Argue your points with verifiable facts, not insults or abuse." (EVDL conventions, point 1e.) http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#conv In