Re: [EVDL] tesla in trouble with "full self driving" marketing

2021-03-13 Thread Haudy Kazemi via EV
It isn't just charging spots. In some areas, apartments turn outdoor, uncovered parking spaces into line item add-ons that can easily be over $100/month. On Sat, Mar 13, 2021, 10:07 Peter VanDerWal via EV wrote: > For appartment dwellers this would also eliminate the need for an EV > charging

Re: [EVDL] tesla in trouble with "full self driving" marketing

2021-03-13 Thread Peter VanDerWal via EV
For appartment dwellers this would also eliminate the need for an EV charging spot. This is actually becoming the norm in many big cities. Fewer and fewer people are driving anymore. With decent public transportation and cabs/uber/lyft it is now significantly cheaper (for many people) to NOT

Re: [EVDL] tesla in trouble with "full self driving" marketing

2021-03-12 Thread Steves via EV
Those caveats pretty much sum up my daily driving experience in Northern Virginia. -Steve > On Mar 12, 2021, at 1:15 AM, Haudy Kazemi via EV wrote: > > Cost is a factor but it alone does not always win the day. After all, if > up-front and operating costs were the only winning factors, we

Re: [EVDL] tesla in trouble with "full self driving" marketing

2021-03-11 Thread Haudy Kazemi via EV
Cost is a factor but it alone does not always win the day. After all, if up-front and operating costs were the only winning factors, we might all be driving heavily depreciated Gen 2 Priuses (with catalytic converter shields), with 200k miles on the odometer. Many of us value the various benefits

Re: [EVDL] tesla in trouble with "full self driving" marketing

2021-03-11 Thread Mr. Sharkey via EV
> pay a cabbie $25 per trip to take you on local > errands twice a week for 20 years ... but you still wouldn't get to drive an exciting, cutting edge EV, aaannnddd... the cabbie probably drives an old ICE beater with bedbugs in the upholstery. Ask me whose driving I have more confidence in,

Re: [EVDL] tesla in trouble with "full self driving" marketing

2021-03-11 Thread Alan Arrison via EV
Just a few reasons you won't see autonomous vehicles anytime soon. .. “there are circumstances and events to which the system is not capable of recognizing or responding. These include static objects and road debris, emergency vehicles, construction zones, large uncontrolled intersections

Re: [EVDL] tesla in trouble with "full self driving" marketing

2021-03-11 Thread EVDL Administrator via EV
This doesn't apply to everyone - it depends on where you live - but if you're in a moderately populated area, for the $50k you'd pay for a Tesla 3 (I'm assuming $40k for the car and another $10k for the alleged self-driving option), you could pay a cabbie $25 per trip to take you on local

Re: [EVDL] tesla in trouble with "full self driving" marketing

2021-03-11 Thread Ed Blackmond via EV
A friend of mine has a model X. It opens the door for her when she walks up to the car. Ed > On Mar 11, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Gail Lucas via EV wrote: > > Yes, Willie, but some of us would need an open the car door and help us in > option too. I would not hesitate to trust the system as it

Re: [EVDL] tesla in trouble with "full self driving" marketing

2021-03-11 Thread Gail Lucas via EV
Yes, Willie, but some of us would need an open the car door and help us in option too. I would not hesitate to trust the system as it won't be eating, drinking, talking on the phone, putting on makeup, or on its way after spending a few hours in a bar, as are many folks driving in my area. You

Re: [EVDL] tesla in trouble with "full self driving" marketing

2021-03-11 Thread Willie via EV
On 3/11/21 2:17 PM, Mr. Sharkey via EV wrote: > Tesla lawyers recently admitted the $10,000 option that Tesla > sells as Full Self-Driving Capability is not, in fact, capable of full > self-driving. I still don't get the fascination with self-driving cars. If I was going to cough up the

Re: [EVDL] tesla in trouble with "full self driving" marketing

2021-03-11 Thread Willie via EV
On 3/11/21 10:36 AM, Peri Hartman via EV wrote: https://www.seattletimes.com/business/tesla-touts-self-driving-to-consumers-to-the-dmv-it-tells-a-different-tale/ Musk has reasons to promote Full Self-Driving. The $10,000 option is a balm to Tesla’s revenues and profits, although just how

Re: [EVDL] tesla in trouble with "full self driving" marketing

2021-03-11 Thread Mr. Sharkey via EV
> Tesla lawyers recently admitted the $10,000 option that Tesla > sells as Full Self-Driving Capability is not, in fact, capable of full > self-driving. I still don't get the fascination with self-driving cars. If I was going to cough up the asking price for the pinnacle of automotive

Re: [EVDL] tesla in trouble with "full self driving" marketing

2021-03-11 Thread EVDL Administrator via EV
On 11 Mar 2021 at 16:36, Peri Hartman via EV wrote: > Tesla lawyers recently admitted the $10,000 option that Tesla > sells as Full Self-Driving Capability is not, in fact, capable of full > self-driving. Good grief. Completely apart from the outright deception here - ten thousand dollars!

[EVDL] tesla in trouble with "full self driving" marketing

2021-03-11 Thread Peri Hartman via EV
https://www.seattletimes.com/business/tesla-touts-self-driving-to-consumers-to-the-dmv-it-tells-a-different-tale/ ... In official correspondence with California’s Department of Motor Vehicles, Tesla lawyers recently admitted the $10,000 option that Tesla sells as Full Self-Driving Capability