Thanks, George
(I find your argument close to a
wholistic (complexity) vision,
only stronger than the assumption how I
tried to argue it. )
John M
- Original Message -
From:
George Levy
To: Everything List
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: Mathema
Dear Bruno, thanks for your detailed
reflections(BM). There are some minor points I want to
re-address.(R-JM) interleaving into the orig. post (My
text: JM:)
John Mikes
- Original Message -
From:
Bruno Marchal
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 6:27
CMR wrote:
>To the question "What is
mathematics" - Podiek's (after Dave Rusin) answer:
>Mathematics is the part of science you could continue to do if
you woke up tomorrow and discovered the universe was >gone.
Let me make an analogy by paraphrasing: Empty space is the part
>To
the question "What is mathematics" - Podiek's (after Dave Rusin) answer:
>Mathematics is the part of science you could continue to do if you
woke up tomorrow and discovered the universe was >gone.
Podiek shouldn't have skipped Leibniz in his reading list on philosophy
(and should've t
Dear John,
Thanks for your quotations from (or through) Podnieks. Here are some
comments.
To the question "What is
mathematics" - Podiek's (after Dave Rusin) answer:
Mathematics is the part of science you could continue to do if you
woke up tomorrow and discovered the universe was gone.
What a
5 matches
Mail list logo