From: Hal Ruhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 23:22:40 -0500
Hi Jesse:
The All contains inconsistent FAS [we have no issue here as far as I can
tell]
I'm not so sure--if your "All" does not include deterministic Turing
From: Hal Ruhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 22:41:45 -0500
Maybe this will help:
The All contains all possible output states of all Turing machines [among
all manner of other info such as states of really messy unive
Hi Jesse:
The All contains inconsistent FAS [we have no issue here as far as I can
tell] and thus all of the theorems of such FAS as some of the kernels of
information simultaneously. [Do we have an issue here?] This content
makes the All inconsistent. [OK?] The All does not output anything -
From: Hal Ruhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jesse Mazer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 22:19:02 -0500
Hi Jesse:
At 09:23 PM 12/7/2004, you wrote:
Hal Ruhl wrote:
To clarify - the All contains all information simultaneously [see the
definition
Maybe this will help:
The All contains all possible output states of all Turing machines [among
all manner of other info such as states of really messy universes]
simultaneously. These states are given "Physical reality" by evolving
Somethings in random order over and over. Some such sequence
Hi Jesse:
At 09:23 PM 12/7/2004, you wrote:
Hal Ruhl wrote:
To clarify - the All contains all information simultaneously [see the
definition in the original post] - including ALL Truing machines with
ALL possible output tapes - so it contains simultaneously both output
tapes re your comment bel
At 06:37 PM 12/7/2004, you wrote:
To clarify - the All contains all information simultaneously [see the
definition in the original post] - including ALL Truing machines with ALL
possible output tapes - so it contains simultaneously both output tapes
re your comment below.
But if there is a fact
Hal Ruhl wrote:
To clarify - the All contains all information simultaneously [see the
definition in the original post] - including ALL Truing machines with ALL
possible output tapes - so it contains simultaneously both output tapes
re your comment below.
But if there is a fact which is true in
Hi Bruno:
At 06:40 AM 12/7/2004, you wrote:
Hi Hal,
In my questions about truth etc I was not really looking for a response
but was rather trying to demonstrate the need for additional information
in your theory.
I don't have a theory. Just an argument showing that if we are machine
then eventu
From: Hal Ruhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 10:46:04 -0500
Hi Jesse:
To clarify - the All contains all information simultaneously [see the
definition in the original post] - including ALL Truing machines with ALL
pos
Hi Jesse:
To clarify - the All contains all information simultaneously [see the
definition in the original post] - including ALL Truing machines with ALL
possible output tapes - so it contains simultaneously both output tapes re
your comment below. It is not a time dependent or belief dependent
Hi Hal,
In my questions about truth etc I was not really looking for a response
but was rather trying to demonstrate the need for additional information
in your theory.
I don't have a theory. Just an argument showing that if we are machine then
eventually physics is derivable from machine psych
12 matches
Mail list logo