peterdjones wrote:
> Georges Quenot wrote:
>> [...]
>> The question of whether there could be other type of objects
>> than mathematical is a different one. I can figure what could
>> mathematical objects and that they can exist (though I am
>> afraid I cannot easily transmit that feeling). It is
>>
>>
>> Bruno Marchal wrote:
>> > Le 01-avr.-06, ࠰0:46, 1Z a 飲it :
>> >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Bruno Marchal wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >> And read perhaps the literature on the mind
>> body problem: all
>> > >> materialist approaches has failed, and then the
>> result I got explains
>> > >> what i
--- 1Z <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Bruno Marchal wrote:
> > Le 01-avr.-06, à 00:46, 1Z a écrit :
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Bruno Marchal wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> And read perhaps the literature on the mind
> body problem: all
> > >> materialist approaches has failed, and then the
> result I
Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Le 01-avr.-06, à 00:46, 1Z a écrit :
>
> >
> >
> > Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >
> >
> >> And read perhaps the literature on the mind body problem: all
> >> materialist approaches has failed, and then the result I got explains
> >> what it should be so.
> >
> > I have my own an
Let us just take the numbers, I mean the finite numbers 0, 1, 2, ...
But let us take them all.
Then it can be shown that numbers without an encoding of "Gone with the
wind" are quite exceptional. Almost all natural numbers, written in
any base, has an encoding of "Gone with the wind", and
Le 01-avr.-06, à 00:46, 1Z a écrit :
>
>
> Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
>> And read perhaps the literature on the mind body problem: all
>> materialist approaches has failed, and then the result I got explains
>> what it should be so.
>
> I have my own analysis of the problem: the words "map" and
6 matches
Mail list logo
