Brent Meeker writes:
> My computer is completely dedicated to sending this email when I click
> on "send".
Actually, it probably isn't. You probably have a multi-tasking operating system which assigns priorities to
different tasks (which is why it sometimes can be as annoying as a human b
Tom Caylor wrote:
On Dec 26, 7:53 pm, Brent Meeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tom Caylor wrote:
> On Dec 26, 3:59 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> I regard the idea of "believing" to be unsound, because it is a
>> pre-Freudian concept, which assumes that each person has
On Dec 26, 7:53 pm, Brent Meeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tom Caylor wrote:
> On Dec 26, 3:59 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> I regard the idea of "believing" to be unsound, because it is a
>> pre-Freudian concept, which assumes that each person has a "single
>> self"
Tom Caylor wrote:
On Dec 26, 3:59 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I regard the idea of "believing" to be unsound, because it is a
pre-Freudian concept, which assumes that each person has a "single
self" that maintains beliefs. A more realistic view is that each
person is co
On Dec 26, 3:59 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I regard the idea of "believing" to be unsound, because it is a
pre-Freudian concept, which assumes that each person has a "single
self" that maintains beliefs. A more realistic view is that each
person is constantly switching a
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
But our main criterion for what to believe should be
what is true, right?
I find it fascinating, as well as consistent with some difficulties in
communication about the most basic concepts, that Stathis would express
this belief of his in the form of a tautology.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Evil ? (was: Hypostases (was: Natural Order & Belief)
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 14:59:17 -0800
I regard the idea of "believing" to be unsound, because it is a
pre-Freudian conc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I regard the idea of "believing" to be unsound, because it is a
pre-Freudian concept, which assumes that each person has a "single
self" that maintains beliefs. A more realistic view is that each
person is constantly switching among various different "ways to think"
in
I regard the idea of "believing" to be unsound, because it is a
pre-Freudian concept, which assumes that each person has a "single
self" that maintains beliefs. A more realistic view is that each
person is constantly switching among various different "ways to think"
in which different assertions
John Mikes wrote:
Brent, you don't REALLY put strange (implied?) words in my mouth, but
that gives the impression to the innocent byreader that I said anything
like that.
BM:
"Did I claim that we had reached a complete inventory??"
JM:
No, you only said:
"> It is only your opinion that the inv
Brent, you don't REALLY put strange (implied?) words in my mouth, but that
gives the impression to the innocent byreader that I said anything like
that.
BM:
"Did I claim that we had reached a complete inventory??"
JM:
No, you only said:
"> It is only your opinion that the inventory is *necessarily
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
Brent Meeker writes:
> I agree with everything you say, and have long admired "The
Hedonistic > Imperative". Motivation need not be linked to pain, and
for that matter > it need not be linked to pleasure either. We can
imagine an artificial > intelligence without
On Dec 26, 9:51 am, Bruno Marchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le 25-déc.-06, à 01:13, Tom Caylor a écrit :
> The "crux" is that he is not symbolic...
I respect your belief or faith, but I want to be frank, I have no
evidences for the idea that "Jesus" is "truth", nor can I be sure of
any cle
Le 25-déc.-06, à 01:13, Tom Caylor a écrit :
It looks like I might have timed out. Hopefully this doesn't appear
two times.
On Dec 24, 8:55 am, Bruno Marchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le 24-déc.-06, à 09:48, Tom Caylor a écrit :
> Bruno,
> ...
> I believe the answer to the question, "Wha
Brent Meeker writes:
> I agree with everything you say, and have long admired "The Hedonistic
> Imperative". Motivation need not be linked to pain, and for that matter
> it need not be linked to pleasure either. We can imagine an artificial
> intelligence without any emotions but completely
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
Hello Dave/Chris,
I agree with everything you say, and have long admired "The Hedonistic
Imperative". Motivation need not be linked to pain, and for that matter
it need not be linked to pleasure either. We can imagine an artificial
intelligence without any emotio
16 matches
Mail list logo
