On 11/07/07, Brent Meeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't see that "relexive" adding anything here. It's just "existence"
> simpliciter isn't it?
Frankly, I'd be happy to concur. My account was to some extent a
recapitulation of the intuitive process by which I reached a view of
this ent
David Nyman wrote:
> On 10/07/07, Brent Meeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I draw a complete blank when I read your use of the word "reflexive". What
>> exactly do you mean? How would you distinguish reflexive from non-reflexive
>> existence? Do numbers exist reflexively? Do somethiings
x list for life coding of events (ideas and announcements) and
discussion of life coding practice.
Subscription: https://www.bek.no/mailman/listinfo/x
Life coding is a mapping of the descriptive means of hardware and
programming onto the world, a concern with an interiority of the
project
On 10/07/07, Brent Meeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I draw a complete blank when I read your use of the word "reflexive". What
> exactly do you mean? How would you distinguish reflexive from non-reflexive
> existence? Do numbers exist reflexively? Do somethiings exist
> non-reflexively?
David Nyman wrote:
> On Jul 6, 2:56 pm, Bruno Marchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It
>> is a unexpected (by me) discovery that quanta belongs to that sharable
>> first person view (making the comp-QM a bit more psychological than
>> some Many-Worlder would perhaps appreciate.
>
> Doesn't thi
On Jul 6, 2:56 pm, Bruno Marchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It
> is a unexpected (by me) discovery that quanta belongs to that sharable
> first person view (making the comp-QM a bit more psychological than
> some Many-Worlder would perhaps appreciate.
Doesn't this strike you as perhaps consist
On 10/07/07, Torgny Tholerus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I am not bored
I'm glad to hear you're not a zombie after all :)
> If I look at our universe from the outside
I'd like to know how you perform this feat.
> I see that I will do something
> tomorrow
I don't doubt it. But this is
On 7/9/07, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 9, 1:39 am, "Mohsen Ravanbakhsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > While I was reading the previous discussion; "justifying theory of
> > everything" , I thought of my recent problem with still imperfection of
> our
> >
David Nyman skrev:
On 09/07/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There can be no dynamic time. In the space-time, time is always
static.
Then you must get very bored ;)
David
But I am not bored, because I don't know what will happen tomorrow. If
I lo
9 matches
Mail list logo
