Oops.
to finish...
For all devices x,
if x is complex is some sense then x is conscious in some (possibly other)
sense.
In other words, for all devices x, (a) -logically entails- (b):
(a) there is a partition D_t of t such that T(x; R, D_t) = 1
(b) there is a partition (D_t)' of t such that T(x
Hi Bruno,
I mean logical implication and definitely -not- in the sense of production
and -most definitely not- causation.
I sat down for once and wrote something down and here's basically what the
statement of my idea (which could easily be "wrong"):
[+1] If x is a (Wolpert) device, then (if "x i
Le 13-mai-08, à 18:27, Brian Tenneson a écrit :
> I must admit to a little hand waving. OK, maybe a lot.
Actually you are not. Not necessarily so, I mean. *I* could have been
wrong. Let me explain:
When you said:
<>
I interpreted as: "Randomness causes or produces consciousness". But
3 matches
Mail list logo
