As a formally trained Physicist, what do I accept? that Physics is
well represented mathematically? That the Multiverse is composed of
mathematical structures some of which represent physical laws? Or
something else?
Ronald
On Aug 6, 10:23 pm, Brent Me
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 11:35 -0700, Brent Meeker wrote:
> But as Bertrand Russell, David Hume and many mystics have pointed out you can
> wake up and
> realize there is consciousness but the "I" that possesses it is a fiction.
There are also many common reports of what is colloquially called "e
Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Very important post, Peter. We are progressing.
>
>
> On 06 Aug 2009, at 19:09, 1Z wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 31 July, 18:55, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>> On 31 Jul 2009, at 18:05, 1Z wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
If it isn;t RITSIAR, it cannot be generating me. Mathematical
proofs
On 07 Aug 2009, at 10:09, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> 2009/8/7 Torgny Tholerus :
>>
>> Bruno Marchal skrev:
>>>
>>> Then it is not "RITSIAR" in the sense of the discussion with David.
>>> Real in the sense that "I" am real. is ambiguous.
>>> Either the "I" refers to my first person, and t
On 22 July, 17:15, David Nyman wrote:
> Dinna fash yursel laddie,
trnaslation: Faut pas te facher.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to eve
Well, given that nobody dare to ask question, I will play the role of
the idiot myself.
On 30 Jul 2009, at 21:22, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
>
> Exercise:
>
>
> 1) how many functions and what are they, from the set {0, 1} to
> himself. What are the functions from {0, 1) to {0, 1}?
>
> Solut
Hi,
2009/8/7 Torgny Tholerus :
>
> Bruno Marchal skrev:
>>
>> Then it is not "RITSIAR" in the sense of the discussion with David.
>> Real in the sense that "I" am real. is ambiguous.
>> Either the "I" refers to my first person, and then I have ontological
>> certainty.
>> As I said on FOR, I can
Bruno Marchal skrev:
>
> Then it is not "RITSIAR" in the sense of the discussion with David.
> Real in the sense that "I" am real. is ambiguous.
> Either the "I" refers to my first person, and then I have ontological
> certainty.
> As I said on FOR, I can conceive that I wake up and realize t
Very important post, Peter. We are progressing.
On 06 Aug 2009, at 19:09, 1Z wrote:
>
>
>
> On 31 July, 18:55, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>> On 31 Jul 2009, at 18:05, 1Z wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> If it isn;t RITSIAR, it cannot be generating me. Mathematical
>>> proofs only prove mathematical "existence",
9 matches
Mail list logo
