On 30 Jan 2011, at 07:41, Rex Allen wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
Rex,
Well here I disagree (with Wikipedia, not with Turing, although he is
responsible for this widespread misconception).
Well, I'll buy that, I reckon. Though the usage of
On 30 Jan 2011, at 08:14, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 1/29/2011 10:41 PM, Rex Allen wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Bruno Marchalmarc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
Rex,
Well here I disagree (with Wikipedia, not with Turing, although he
is
responsible for this widespread misconception).
Saibal,
You (still?) miss the first person indeterminacy. It leads to
mathematicalism, even arithmeticalism, but it put self-referential
constraints on how the physical realities, appaers actually how the
coupling consciousness/realities (a sort of Galois connection) arise
from
On Jan 25, 9:04 am, Stephen Paul King stephe...@charter.net wrote:
Dear Bruno and Friends,
While we are considering the idea of “causal efficacy” here and not
hidden variable theories, the fact that it has been experimentally verified
that Nature violates the principle Locality.
Hi 1Z,
I would agree with you but we are not considering an FAPP rule of thumb
for everyday situations, we are considering ontological questions. If our
conjectures and assumptions are contraindicated by experimental evidence,
should that evidence not be relevant to hypostases regarding
Interleaved...
John Mikes wrote:
Hi, Colin,
I enjoyed your diatribe. (From time to time I accept some of your
ideas and even include them into my ways of thinking - which may be a
praise or a threat).
Question: Could you briefly identify your usage of science - even
scientist?
The
Interleaved ...
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 Jan 2011, at 06:27, ColinHales wrote:
Now say humans are conscious? Prove it.
To which I say COMP is true? Prove it
Been around this loop many times. :-)
COMP is a solution of x - ~Bx, like consciousness, and consistency.
If COMP is true, it
7 matches
Mail list logo
