Hi Terren,
On 13 Jun 2011, at 18:46, Terren Suydam wrote:
Long time lurker here, very intrigued by all the discussions here when
I have time for them!
Earlier in response to Colin Hales you wrote: Actually, comp prevents
artificial intelligence.
Can you elaborate on this? If we assume
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 3:55 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/11/2011 7:51 AM, Rex Allen wrote:
Instrumentalism, anyone?
I'll have a helping. And I'll also note that instrumentalism with a pinch
of common sense is as good as it gets.
Common sense? What is this common sense
Thanks for the reply Bruno, comments below...
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
doesn't that imply the possibility
of an artificial intelligence?
In a weak sense of Artificial Intelligence, yes. In a strong sense, no.
If you are duplicated at the right
The difference is in the
paper and should be non-existent of COMP is true.
Now I see your point. Thanks, I have missed it.
On 14.06.2011 01:41 Colin Hales said the following:
Hi Evgenii,
I expect you are not alone in struggling with the Natural Computation
(NC) vs Artificial Computation
4 matches
Mail list logo
