2012/5/20 Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net
On 5/20/2012 12:24 AM, Russell Standish wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 01:17:18PM -0400, Stephen P. King wrote:
Dear Bruno,
I finally found a good and accessible paperhttp://www.google.com/**
On May 20, 1:15 am, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
You only split when some quantum event gets amplified to make a
macroscopic, i.e.
quasi-classical, difference. Otherwise Craig Weinberg is a somewhat fuzzy
operator
projecting onto a lot of slight different, but classically
Stephen,
I have a more general question. I am not a mathematician and I do not
quite understand the relationship between mathematics and the world that
surround me.
It seems to me that your writing implies that there is the intimate
connections between mathematics and the Universe. Could
On 5/20/2012 6:06 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
In Bruno's theory, the physical world is not computed by an algorithm,
the physical world is the limit of all computations going throught
your current state... what is computable is your current state, an
infinity of computations goes through it.
On 5/20/2012 9:39 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Stephen,
I have a more general question. I am not a mathematician and I do not
quite understand the relationship between mathematics and the world
that surround me.
Dear Evgenii,
I am just a person with insatiable curiosity and the strange
2012/5/20 Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net
On 5/20/2012 6:06 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
In Bruno's theory, the physical world is not computed by an algorithm,
the physical world is the limit of all computations going throught your
current state... what is computable is your current
On 19 May 2012, at 19:46, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On May 18, 2:56 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 17 May 2012, at 23:02, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On May 17, 2:04 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Sense and matter is what I search an explanation for. You start at
the
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
All free will means is any change made because you wanted to.
That would be fine except I know that is NOT all you believe free will
means because I know you would not be happy about a calculator having free
will, but
On 20 May 2012, at 19:03, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 5/20/2012 9:39 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Stephen,
I have a more general question. I am not a mathematician and I do
not quite understand the relationship between mathematics and the
world that surround me.
Dear Evgenii,
I am just
On 5/20/2012 9:27 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 5/20/2012 6:06 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
In Bruno's theory, the physical world is not computed by an algorithm, the physical
world is the limit of all computations going throught your current state... what is
computable is your current state,
On 5/20/2012 10:03 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
3) Is there at least one physical system running the computations?
No, if the UDA is correct... well technically there still could be a primitive physical
universe, but you could not use it to correctly predict your next moment, nor what you
On 5/20/2012 1:03 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2012/5/20 Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net
mailto:stephe...@charter.net
On 5/20/2012 6:06 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
In Bruno's theory, the physical world is not computed by an
algorithm, the physical world is the limit of all
On 5/20/2012 3:06 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/20/2012 9:27 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 5/20/2012 6:06 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
In Bruno's theory, the physical world is not computed by an
algorithm, the physical world is the limit of all computations going
throught your current state...
On 5/20/2012 1:31 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
My point is that for there to exist an a priori given string of numbers that is
equivalent our universe there must exist a computation of the homomorphies between all
possible 4-manifolds.
Why?
Markov theorem tells us that no such homomorphy
On 5/20/2012 4:39 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/20/2012 1:31 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
My point is that for there to exist an a priori given string of
numbers that is equivalent our universe there must exist a
computation of the homomorphies between all possible 4-manifolds.
Why?
Hi Brent,
On 5/20/2012 7:13 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 5/20/2012 4:39 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/20/2012 1:31 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
My point is that for there to exist an a priori given string of
numbers that is equivalent our universe there must exist a
computation of the homomorphies
On 5/20/2012 4:13 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 5/20/2012 4:39 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/20/2012 1:31 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
My point is that for there to exist an a priori given string of numbers that is
equivalent our universe there must exist a computation of the homomorphies between
On 5/20/2012 4:25 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
I need to add a remark here. We cannot just assume one particular 4-manifold as the
one we exist on/in. We have to consider the entire ensemble of them to even ask coherent
questions about the one we are in.
But we don't have to assume the
On 5/20/2012 8:08 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/20/2012 4:13 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 5/20/2012 4:39 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/20/2012 1:31 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
My point is that for there to exist an a priori given string of
numbers that is equivalent our universe there must exist a
On 5/20/2012 6:53 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 5/20/2012 8:08 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/20/2012 4:13 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 5/20/2012 4:39 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/20/2012 1:31 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
My point is that for there to exist an a priori given string of numbers that
On 5/20/2012 6:53 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
The result is an exhaustive classification of compact 4-mainifolds. The absence of
such a classification neither prevents nor entails the existence of the manifolds.
But you fail to see that without the means to define the manifolds, there is
On May 20, 1:49 pm, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
All free will means is any change made because you wanted to.
That would be fine except I know that is NOT all you believe free will
means because I know
On 5/20/2012 10:17 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/20/2012 6:53 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 5/20/2012 8:08 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/20/2012 4:13 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 5/20/2012 4:39 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/20/2012 1:31 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
My point is that for there to exist an
On 5/20/2012 10:26 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/20/2012 6:53 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
The result is an exhaustive classification of compact 4-mainifolds.
The absence of such a classification neither prevents nor entails
the existence of the manifolds.
But you fail to see that without the
On 5/20/2012 8:15 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 5/20/2012 10:17 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/20/2012 6:53 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 5/20/2012 8:08 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/20/2012 4:13 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 5/20/2012 4:39 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/20/2012 1:31 PM, Stephen P. King
2012/5/21 Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net
On 5/20/2012 4:39 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/20/2012 1:31 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
My point is that for there to exist an a priori given string of
numbers that is equivalent our universe there must exist a computation of
the homomorphies
26 matches
Mail list logo
