On 6/30/2012 9:56 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/30/2012 5:38 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 6/30/2012 7:35 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/30/2012 2:52 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
It seems to me that with functionalism a human identity cannot
necessarily be different from a any sufficiently complex functiona
On 6/30/2012 5:38 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 6/30/2012 7:35 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/30/2012 2:52 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
It seems to me that with functionalism a human identity cannot necessarily be
different from a any sufficiently complex functional interaction. Something like a
war, f
On 6/30/2012 7:35 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/30/2012 2:52 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
It seems to me that with functionalism a human identity cannot
necessarily be different from a any sufficiently complex functional
interaction. Something like a war, for instance involves lots of
dynamic i/o, 'pr
On 6/30/2012 2:52 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
It seems to me that with functionalism a human identity cannot necessarily be
different from a any sufficiently complex functional interaction. Something
like a war, for instance involves lots of dynamic i/o, 'processing', etc.
My question then is: C
It seems to me that with functionalism a human identity cannot necessarily be
different from a any sufficiently complex functional interaction. Something
like a war, for instance involves lots of dynamic i/o, 'processing', etc.
My question then is: Can you teleport the American Civil War to the
On 6/30/2012 12:20 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 30 Jun 2012, at 18:44, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
I think that you have mentioned that mechanism is incompatible with materialism. How
this follows then?
Because concerning computation and emulation (exact simulation) all universal system are
equi
On 6/30/2012 12:17 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 Jun 2012, at 21:20, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 Bruno Marchal mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be>> wrote:
> You said yourself that the first person cannot be defined. How could we
verify
that prediction? Except by feeling to be one
On 30 Jun 2012, at 18:44, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 30.06.2012 11:14 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 29 Jun 2012, at 20:01, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 11.04.2012 11:11 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 10 Apr 2012, at 21:21, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Hence if you know something
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 Bruno Marchal wrote:
>> As I said before if you really had complete information then you could
>> make 2 predictions:
>> 1) I Bruno Marchal will write in my diary "I Bruno Marchal am now in
>> Washington and only Washington".
>> 2) I Bruno Marchal will write in my diary "I B
On 30.06.2012 11:14 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 29 Jun 2012, at 20:01, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 11.04.2012 11:11 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 10 Apr 2012, at 21:21, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Hence if you know something in Internet or in the written form,
I would apprec
On 29 Jun 2012, at 20:01, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 11.04.2012 11:11 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 10 Apr 2012, at 21:21, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Hence if you know something in Internet or in the written form, I
would appreciate your advice. The best about 20 pages, not too
litt
On 29 Jun 2012, at 21:20, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 Bruno Marchal wrote:
> You said yourself that the first person cannot be defined. How
could we verify that prediction? Except by feeling to be one of the
W and M reconstituted person. And from their points of viex, the
pr
12 matches
Mail list logo
