On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:52 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 8/27/2013 3:55 PM, Chris de Morsella wrote:
From: John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: When will a computer pass the Turing Test?
Hi Chris,
you are saying that:
No, Saibal you invoke the moral quality of the act by describing it as
a good thing
But this is exactly why I want to avoid this whole morality thing, it
comes with a baggage that then implies things that I don't support. I
can think that 9/11 was a good
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.comwrote:
Bullshit. Axioms don't need proof, and the most fundamental axiom in all
of logic is that X is Y or X is not Y. Everything else is built on top of
that. And only somebody who was absolutely desperate to prove the
Hi spudboy100
Anything that moves according to rules, a program, regulations, a control, etc.
is not mind.
Mind has to be free and unconstrained, at least in principle.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
-
From: meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
[snip]
Although reductionism has recently received a lot
of bad press from supermarket tabloids and new age
gurus the fact remains that if
From: Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 11:17 PM
Subject: Re: When will a computer pass the Turing Test?
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:52 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On
From: John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Bullshit. Axioms don't need proof, and the most fundamental axiom in all of
logic is that X is Y or X is not Y. Everything else is
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:05:27PM -0700, Chris de Morsella wrote:
John keeps insisting that X is Y or X is not Y. True, but so what? It does
not provide any great insight into how the brain works as a dynamic entity.
Basically based on reading his posts on the subject what I am stating is
Details on my blog, Radical
Computinghttp://radicomp.blogspot.com/2013/08/proof-of-impossibility-sketch-for.html
.
The summary is this, we can argue that a Theory of Everything is
characterized by either syntactic, negation, or deductive completeness or
universal closure. A *theory of
9 matches
Mail list logo
