On Saturday, August 8, 2015 at 5:09:49 AM UTC+10, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Pierz >
> wrote:
>
>>
> >
>> My point isn't that MWI is true. My point is you understand it and how it
>> leads to the appearance of indeterminacy in a completely determined system.
>>
> On 07-Aug-2015, at 9:46 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
>> On 07 Aug 2015, at 05:54, Samiya Illias wrote:
>>
>> Bruno,
>> I'm reading R.A. Schwaller de Lubicz. In the Introduction to A Study of
>> Numbers, they quote his last words. It reminds me of your salvia beings.
>> Thought the attach
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 smitra wrote:
>
> You can just define personal identity as a single observer moment, which
> includes any memories of the outcomes of the duplication experiments, so
> the string of the "W"'s and "M"'should be included in the definition of
> "you".
>
OK.
>
> But the
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Pierz wrote:
>
>
> My point isn't that MWI is true. My point is you understand it and how it
> leads to the appearance of indeterminacy in a completely determined system.
>
> Indeterminacy is a 1-p illusion
>
It's either an illusion or it is not
and pee
On 07 Aug 2015, at 05:54, Samiya Illias wrote:
Bruno,
I'm reading R.A. Schwaller de Lubicz. In the Introduction to A Study
of Numbers, they quote his last words. It reminds me of your salvia
beings. Thought the attached might be of interest to you.
Regards,
Samiya
Nice quote Samya.
I lo
On 06 Aug 2015, at 19:23, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
>>> the nuance is not in the name or in the pronouns, but in
the 1p/3p difference, or in the 1-1p/3-1p difference.
>> In a world with people duplicating machines what
exactly is the dif
On 07 Aug 2015, at 02:59, Pierz wrote:
On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 8:06:31 PM UTC+10, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 06 Aug 2015, at 02:39, Pierz wrote:
> Mein Gott, this argument reminds me of the fire in Siberia that
> started burning in the Holocene and is still going. Why do you keep
> taki
On 06 Aug 2015, at 19:38, smitra wrote:
You can just define personal identity as a single observer moment,
That is dangerous talk, but i see what you mean.
which includes any memories of the outcomes of the duplication
experiments, so the string of the "W"'s and "M"'should be included
i
On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 1:41:51 PM UTC+10, chris peck wrote:
>
> @ Pierz
>
> >> If he refuses to
> > acknowledge MWI as a valid account due to his pronoun concerns, then
> > fine, maybe he should publish a refutation of Everett to that
> > effect.
>
> but isn't John's point that pro-n
9 matches
Mail list logo
