How to solve the problem of identity: http://existentialcomics.com/comic/121
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >> No idea what " two 3-1 "I" " is and very much doubt it is worth
>> knowing.
>
>
> See preceding posts.
I tried that. It didn't help.
>> If computationalism is correct then everything about "you" can
>> be
On 7/28/2016 11:41 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
Why does it need to be defined? Why not recognize it is not a well
defined concept...like the end of a road. We need operational legal
definitions as to when a person is still competent to make decisions
about themselves...and those are pretty
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>
> It's not the duplication that is supposed to produce another person,
That's right, and the reason is the duplicating machine duplicates
everything about you, not almost everything, *EVERYTHING*. So there are
On 28 Jul 2016, at 21:56, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
> there are two 3-1 "I",
No idea what "two 3-1 "I" " is and very much doubt
it is worth knowing.
See preceding posts.
> Turing emulable telepathy.
No
On 28 Jul 2016, at 20:18, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
>>> "I" designates the M guy experience in Moscow, and
the W experience of the W-guy in W.
>> I know, and that's why that personal pronoun is
ambiguous
>
On 29/07/2016 4:30 pm, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 7/28/2016 11:11 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 29/07/2016 3:59 pm, Brent Meeker wrote:
But they are not "one person". Although they share the same
memories of before the duplication that have different memories
afterward.
According to that
On 7/28/2016 11:11 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 29/07/2016 3:59 pm, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 7/28/2016 10:20 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 29/07/2016 2:42 pm, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 7/28/2016 9:20 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
That is one of the paradoxical aspects of duplication -- the
On 29/07/2016 3:59 pm, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 7/28/2016 10:20 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 29/07/2016 2:42 pm, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 7/28/2016 9:20 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
That is one of the paradoxical aspects of duplication -- the
duplicates become different persons because of the
On 7/28/2016 10:20 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 29/07/2016 2:42 pm, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 7/28/2016 9:20 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 29/07/2016 12:32 pm, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 7/28/2016 6:55 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 29/07/2016 5:56 am, John Clark wrote:
If
computationalism
is
10 matches
Mail list logo