On 9/13/2016 6:25 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 14/09/2016 10:13 am, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 9/13/2016 7:22 AM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On Sunday, 11 September 2016, Brent Meeker wrote:
In the UD model of the world, time as we perceive it, is
emergent. The
On 14/09/2016 11:24 am, Stephen Paul King wrote:
"...an "observer moment" or a "thought" are infinitely many threads
and there is no reference by which you can define cutting them all at
"the same time"."
I agree that there is no natural preference for a basis of the
threads, but ISTM that
On 14/09/2016 10:13 am, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 9/13/2016 7:22 AM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On Sunday, 11 September 2016, Brent Meeker wrote:
In the UD model of the world, time as we perceive it, is
emergent. The "execution" of the program is timeless and
"...an "observer moment" or a "thought" are infinitely many threads and
there is no reference by which you can define cutting them all at "the same
time"."
I agree that there is no natural preference for a basis of the threads,
but ISTM that each Intelligence has its very own basis of biases
"I was tired of having to find citations for every claim I made"
http://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/citation-needed
I'll bet lawyers would like one too.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this
On 9/13/2016 7:22 AM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On Sunday, 11 September 2016, Brent Meeker wrote:
In the UD model of the world, time as we perceive it, is
emergent. The "execution" of the program is timeless and exists
in Platonia. So the steps of the
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 Telmo Menezes wrote:
>
> In my "designed superintelligence" scenario, the entity is confronted
>
> w
> ith a protection mechanism that was conceived by a lesser
> intelligence.
Yes, the most recent iteration of the Jupiter Brain was
On 13 Sep 2016, at 16:22, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On Sunday, 11 September 2016, Brent Meeker
wrote:
In the UD model of the world, time as we perceive it, is emergent.
The "execution" of the program is timeless and exists in Platonia.
So the steps of the UD
On 13 Sep 2016, at 11:47, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 3:00 AM, John Clark
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 Telmo Menezes wrote:
We know that humans are capable of choosing self-destruction. It is
also obvious that most don't
On 13 Sep 2016, at 00:46, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
[SNIP]
On Monday, September 12, 2016 at 2:14:18 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
On 11 Sep 2016, at 20:48, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
You create them by virtue of what you DO, say in an experiment. Or
do you back off from
Not to rehash an old chestnut, but can a bit dance on an infinitesimal?
On Sep 13, 2016 10:22 AM, "Stathis Papaioannou" wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, 11 September 2016, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>> In the UD model of the world, time as we perceive it, is
On Sunday, 11 September 2016, Brent Meeker wrote:
> In the UD model of the world, time as we perceive it, is emergent. The
> "execution" of the program is timeless and exists in Platonia. So the
> steps of the UD have no duration, they are logically prior to time and
>
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 3:00 AM, John Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 Telmo Menezes wrote:
>
>> >
>> We know that humans are capable of choosing self-destruction. It is
>> also obvious that most don't
>
>
> I would argue that given the proper
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>
> On 9/12/2016 3:00 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Brent Meeker
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/12/2016 8:50 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at
14 matches
Mail list logo