Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 7:26:56 PM UTC, Brent wrote: > > > > On 7/25/2018 11:54 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 25 Jul 2018, at 16:36, Jason Resch > > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 10:47 PM, Brent Meeker > wrote: > >> >> >> On 7/24/2018 7:02 PM, Jason Resch wrote: >> >> >> >> O

Re: Radioactive Decay States

> On 27 Jul 2018, at 20:40, Brent Meeker wrote: > > > > On 7/27/2018 3:41 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> That is solved in QM by having only square integral functions, which tends >> to zero on infinity. >> A classical wave with arbitrary high amplitude is an dubious physical >> reality. It be

Re: Radioactive Decay States

> On 27 Jul 2018, at 21:07, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 10:41:32 AM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> On 26 Jul 2018, at 23:37, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 4:59:01 PM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >>> On 26 Jul 201

Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

> On 27 Jul 2018, at 17:59, John Clark wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 6:53 AM, Bruno Marchal > wrote: > > >>Neither I nor anybody else has ever seen a calculation other than the > >>physical sort, > > >You assume Aristotle philosophy, > > Despite what the curr

Re: My final word on the MWI --

> On 27 Jul 2018, at 23:05, Brent Meeker wrote: > > > > On 7/27/2018 12:19 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com > wrote: >> >> >> On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 6:18:49 PM UTC, Brent wrote: >> >> >> On 7/26/2018 11:31 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >>> >>> >>> Le ven. 27

Re: My final word on the MWI --

> On 28 Jul 2018, at 00:12, Brent Meeker wrote: > > > > On 7/27/2018 1:58 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> >> >> Le ven. 27 juil. 2018 à 22:48, Brent Meeker > > a écrit : >> >> >> On 7/27/2018 11:21 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >>> >>> >>> Le ven. 27 juil. 2018 à

Re: Radioactive Decay States

On Saturday, July 28, 2018 at 11:39:34 AM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 27 Jul 2018, at 21:07, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 10:41:32 AM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> On 26 Jul 2018, at 23:37, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thursday, July 26, 2

Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 7:48 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> Despite what the current President of the USA says facts actually exist; >> and so it is not an assumption it is a FACT that neither I nor anybody else >> has ever seen a calculation other than the physical sort. > > > > > *That is an ob

Re: My final word on the MWI --

> On 28 Jul 2018, at 01:37, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 7:15:58 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 6:19:47 PM UTC, Quentin Anciaux wrote: > > > Le ven. 27 juil. 2018 à 19:55, > a écrit : > > > On Friday, July 27, 2018

Re: My final word on the MWI --

On Saturday, July 28, 2018 at 5:44:54 PM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 28 Jul 2018, at 01:37, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 7:15:58 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> >> >> On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 6:19:47 PM UTC, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >>> >>> >>>

Re: My final word on the MWI --

On Saturday, July 28, 2018 at 12:44:54 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > > The whole weirdness of QM is that we can measure effects which in that > formalism entails the actuality of counterfactuals. > Counterfactuals in QM do not have the same ontology as classical objects. Prior to a measur

Combinators 1 (Introduction)

Hi Jason, people, I will send my post on the Church-Turing thesis and incompleteness later. It is too long. So, let us proceed with the combinators. Two seconds of historical motivation. During the crisis in set theory, Moses Schoenfinkel publishes, in 1924, an attempt to found mathematics on

Realizable quantum states

Up and Dn are realizable physical states for a spin 1/2 particle. Up - Dn, and Up + Dn are also realizable, that is physical states of a spin 1/2 particle, according to the QM formaliam. We can't measure the latter two states because, presumably, we can't imagine what they are. Not being able t