Direct brain-to-brain communication allegedly demonstrated

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/scientists-demonstrate-direct-brain-to-brain-communication-in-humans/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email

Re: In search of method

On Friday, November 1, 2019 at 12:24:21 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > On Thursday, October 31, 2019 at 4:33:29 PM UTC-5, Tomasz Rola wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 09:56:01AM -0700, Philip Thrift wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-crisis-in-ph

Re: In search of method

On Thursday, October 31, 2019 at 4:33:29 PM UTC-5, Tomasz Rola wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 09:56:01AM -0700, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > > > > http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-crisis-in-physics-is-not-only-about.html > > > Yeah. Interesting article and comments are worth

Re: Superposition Misinterpreted

On Thursday, October 31, 2019 at 6:04:58 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 30 Oct 2019, at 21:50, Alan Grayson > > wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 5:53:10 PM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> >> On Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 5:18:45 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 10/

Re: Galileo!

On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 4:46 PM Philip Thrift wrote: >> It's true, just like Bruno I also believe in the existence of immaterial >> things. I believe that adjectives exist and in fact I am one, I am the way >> atoms behave when they are organized in a Johnkclarkian way. I disagree >> with Bruno i

Re: In search of method

On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 09:56:01AM -0700, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-crisis-in-physics-is-not-only-about.html Yeah. Interesting article and comments are worth a read, too. Perhaps the problem she described stems from limits in human cognition. quote:

Re: Galileo!

On Thursday, October 31, 2019 at 3:09:21 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 12:23 PM Philip Thrift > wrote: > > On Thursday, October 31, 2019 at 8:55:45 AM UTC-5, John Clark wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 9:00 AM Bruno Marchal wrote: >>> >>> >>> *I have no e

Re: Galileo!

On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 12:23 PM Philip Thrift wrote: On Thursday, October 31, 2019 at 8:55:45 AM UTC-5, John Clark wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 9:00 AM Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >>> >>> *I have no evidence that christianity was a fraud before 529. * >>> >> >> >> So you believe Jesus w

In search of method

http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-crisis-in-physics-is-not-only-about.html @philipthrift -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everyt

Re: Galileo!

On Thursday, October 31, 2019 at 8:55:45 AM UTC-5, John Clark wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 9:00 AM Bruno Marchal > wrote: > > >> > *I have no evidence that christianity was a fraud before 529. * >> > > So you believe Jesus was the son of God, that God sent His only son to > Earth so hu

Re: Galileo!

On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 9:00 AM Bruno Marchal wrote: > > *I have no evidence that christianity was a fraud before 529. * > So you believe Jesus was the son of God, that God sent His only son to Earth so humans could torture him to death because that was the only way God could forgive them for

Re: Galileo!

On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 8:45 AM Bruno Marchal wrote: >> If there was some deep existential problem you wanted to know more about >> I can understand why you would want to discuss it with a mathematician or a >> scientist, but why would you ask a expert on religion? Why would you expect >> a theol

Re: Galileo!

> On 30 Oct 2019, at 22:48, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List > wrote: > > > > On 10/30/2019 3:42 AM, John Clark wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 5:40 AM Bruno Marchal > > wrote: >> >> >> There is one why question religion can not answer and claims it would be >>

Re: Galileo!

> On 30 Oct 2019, at 22:42, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List > wrote: > > > > On 10/30/2019 2:40 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >>> On 29 Oct 2019, at 21:24, John Clark >> > wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 1:50 PM 'Brent Meeker' >>> >>

Re: Galileo!

> On 30 Oct 2019, at 11:42, John Clark wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 5:40 AM Bruno Marchal > wrote: > > >> There is one why question religion can not answer and claims it would be > >> wicked to even ask: Why is a religious answer better than no answer at all? >

Re: Galileo!

> On 30 Oct 2019, at 10:36, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 4:27:48 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> On 29 Oct 2019, at 18:50, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List The sciences do not try to explain, they hardly even try to interpret, they mainly m

Re: Interesting lady; Susan Schneider

> On 30 Oct 2019, at 23:54, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 5:45:29 PM UTC-5, stathisp wrote: > > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 at 07:44, Alan Grayson > wrote: > > > On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 4:30:19 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > On Wednesday, Octob

Re: Interesting lady; Susan Schneider

> On 30 Oct 2019, at 11:30, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 5:01:14 AM UTC-5, Alan Grayson wrote: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Schneider > > > > > > It's a common AI view, that the program (programming

Re: Superposition Misinterpreted

> On 30 Oct 2019, at 21:50, Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 5:53:10 PM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote: > > On Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 5:18:45 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote: > > On 10/29/2019 3:48 PM, Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> On Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 1:55:17 PM UT

Re: Interesting lady; Susan Schneider

On Thursday, October 31, 2019 at 5:47:14 AM UTC-5, John Clark wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 6:54 PM Philip Thrift > wrote: > > >> The computation is the same independently of the substrate of its >>> implementation. For example, you could run the same program on a computer >>> based on va

Re: Interesting lady; Susan Schneider

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 6:54 PM Philip Thrift wrote: >> The computation is the same independently of the substrate of its >> implementation. For example, you could run the same program on a computer >> based on vacuum tubes or transistors, with the same output. >> >>> Stathis Papaioannou >> > > *

Re: Galileo!

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 5:49 PM 'Brent Meeker' < everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote: >> If there was some deep existential problem you wanted to know more about >> I can understand why you would want to discuss it with a mathematician or a >> scientist, but why would you ask a expert on reli