by saying, "well, here's another candidate!" But Cantor's procedure
disqualified *any*, repeat *any* candidate enumeration.
Barry Brent
On Nov 20, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Torgny Tholerus wrote:
> Bruno Marchal skrev:
>> But then the complementary sequence (with the 0 an
That isn't a bijection.
Barry
On Nov 21, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Torgny Tholerus wrote:
> Bruno Marchal skrev:
>> Le 20-nov.-07, à 23:39, Barry Brent wrote :
>>> You're saying that, just because you can *write down* the missing
>>> sequence (at the beginning
lerus wrote:
> Bruno Marchal skrev:
>> Le 20-nov.-07, à 23:39, Barry Brent wrote :
>>> You're saying that, just because you can *write down* the missing
>>> sequence (at the beginning, middle or anywhere else in the list),
>>> it follows that there *is* no m
y phd thesis (study and simulations
> of a certain two-qubit procedure, a sort of benchmark).
>
> I guess, I'll be fine at the beginning of the New Year.
>
> Sincerely,
> Mirek
>
>
> >
Dr. Barry Brent
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~barryb0/
rs in the set. Thus,
> D = 0,0,0,0,...
> But this is the number 1 which we know was in the set to begin
> with. What happened to it?
>
> I would suggest that the diagonal method does not find a number
> which is different from all the members of a set, but rather finds
e process.
> They must still be in there, with definite positions, despite the
> fact that their indices are now infinite and ill-defined.
>
> If the diagonalization process does not produce the proffered
> result in this case
g is not written in a formal language--it's written in English. The
fact that this English language description is finite doesn't prove
that g is computable with regard to L, ie, doesn't prove that g is
one of the f_n.
I'm an amateur at this--this "solution" is reall
tle while, and I
made my (sketchy) acquaintance with these ideas a very long time
ago. Sorry if I'm way off topic. Tell me to go look it up
somewhere, or stop wasting time, if you want to...
Barry Brent
On Dec 18, 2007, at 8:49 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> Le 17-déc.-07,
Excellent, Bruno, Thanks!
Barry
On Dec 19, 2007, at 7:57 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> Hi Barry,
>
>
> Le 18-déc.-07, à 18:52, Barry Brent a écrit :
>
>>
>> Bruno--
>>
>> Ahh, my amateur status is nakedly exposed. I'm going to expose my
&
9 matches
Mail list logo
