2012/5/20 Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net
On 5/20/2012 12:24 AM, Russell Standish wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 01:17:18PM -0400, Stephen P. King wrote:
Dear Bruno,
I finally found a good and accessible paperhttp://www.google.com/**
Stephen,
I have a more general question. I am not a mathematician and I do not
quite understand the relationship between mathematics and the world that
surround me.
It seems to me that your writing implies that there is the intimate
connections between mathematics and the Universe. Could
On 5/20/2012 9:39 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Stephen,
I have a more general question. I am not a mathematician and I do not
quite understand the relationship between mathematics and the world
that surround me.
Dear Evgenii,
I am just a person with insatiable curiosity and the strange
On 20 May 2012, at 19:03, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 5/20/2012 9:39 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Stephen,
I have a more general question. I am not a mathematician and I do
not quite understand the relationship between mathematics and the
world that surround me.
Dear Evgenii,
I am just
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 01:17:18PM -0400, Stephen P. King wrote:
Dear Bruno,
I finally found a good and accessible paper
On 5/20/2012 12:24 AM, Russell Standish wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 01:17:18PM -0400, Stephen P. King wrote:
Dear Bruno,
I finally found a good and accessible
On 5/18/2012 10:19 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Hi Bruno and Russell,
This is one of the reasons I am skeptical of Bruno's immaterialism:
http://www.mathnet.ru/php/archive.phtml?wshow=paperjrnid=impaperid=471option_lang=eng
Markov's theorem and algorithmically non-recognizable
immaterialism:
http://www.mathnet.ru/php/archive.phtml?wshow=paperjrnid=impaperid=471option_lang=eng
Markov's theorem and algorithmically non-recognizable combinatorial
manifolds
M. A. Shtan'ko
Abstract: We prove the theorem of Markov on the existence of an
algorithmically non-recognizable
On 5/19/2012 3:02 AM, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/18/2012 10:19 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Hi Bruno and Russell,
This is one of the reasons I am skeptical of Bruno's immaterialism:
http://www.mathnet.ru/php/archive.phtml?wshow=paperjrnid=impaperid=471option_lang=eng
Markov's theorem
=471option_lang=eng
Markov's theorem and algorithmically non-recognizable combinatorial
manifolds
M. A. Shtan'ko
http://www.mathnet.ru/php/person.phtml?option_lang=engpersonid=8892
*Abstract:* We prove the theorem of Markov on the existence of an
algorithmically non-recognizable
On 5/19/2012 4:06 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Stephen,
I presented an argument. Whatever you read, if it casts a doubt on the
validity of the argument, you have to use what you read to find the
invalid step.
If not, you act like so many papers pretending that cannabis is a
dangerous, but
On 19 May 2012, at 19:17, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 5/19/2012 4:06 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Stephen,
I presented an argument. Whatever you read, if it casts a doubt on
the validity of the argument, you have to use what youread
to find the invalid step.
If not, you act like so
On 5/19/2012 2:11 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 19 May 2012, at 19:17, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 5/19/2012 4:06 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Stephen,
I presented an argument. Whatever you read, if it casts a doubt on
the validity of the argument, you have to use what you read to find
the
Hi Bruno and Russell,
This is one of the reasons I am skeptical of Bruno's immaterialism:
http://www.mathnet.ru/php/archive.phtml?wshow=paperjrnid=impaperid=471option_lang=eng
Markov's theorem and algorithmically non-recognizable combinatorial
manifolds
M. A. Shtan'ko
http
14 matches
Mail list logo
