Re: Jack Mallah's paper on QS.

2010-01-26 Thread Stephen Paul King
Hi Jack, - Original Message - From: "Jack Mallah" To: Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 1:50 PM Subject: Re: Jack Mallah's paper on QS. -- On Mon, 1/25/10, Stephen Paul King wrote: Does not the mutual interfearence between the "copies" hace something to do

Re: Jack Mallah's paper on QS.

2010-01-26 Thread Jack Mallah
-- On Mon, 1/25/10, Stephen Paul King wrote: > Does not the mutual interfearence between the "copies" hace something to do > with a QM systems ability to compute exponensially more than a classical > system? If so, then reducing the number or density of copies would lead to an > attenuation in

Re: Jack Mallah's paper on QS.

2010-01-25 Thread Stephen Paul King
Hi Jacques, AS I re-read your paper, I had a thought: Does not the mutual interfearence between the "copies" hace something to do with a QM systems ability to compute exponensially more than a classical system? If so, then reducing the number or density of copies would lead to an attenuatio