Ah, an even more elegant argument against ZPE than the off-mass shell
argument. Thanks for that tip, Brent. :-)
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:38 PM, meekerdb wrote:
> On 6/25/2013 1:27 PM, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>
> One wonders why this simple observed fact does not percolate down to the
> masse
On 6/25/2013 1:27 PM, Stephen Paul King wrote:
One wonders why this simple observed fact does not percolate down to the masses that
continue to spout nonsense that is contrary to the fact. The zero point energy is, at
best, electromagnetic in nature and since it is off-mass-shell" cannot contrib
energy by 120 orders of
> magnitude, probably the strongest falsification ever achieved.
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Roger Clough
> > wrote:
>
>> *Looking for energy in all the wrong places. Plato's One vs. zero point
>> energy
>>
>> as
Astronomical observations of the cosmological constant has falsified the
hypothesis that all energy comes from zero-point energy by 120 orders of
magnitude, probably the strongest falsification ever achieved.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
> *Looking for energy in
Looking for energy in all the wrong places. Plato's One vs. zero point energy
as the ultimate source of energy.
If we compare the metaphysics of Aristostle and Plato,
we see that Aristotle's fundamental level is the bottom
level of Being, that of matter. Plato's metrap
Looking for energy in all the wrong places. Plato's One vs. zero point energy
as the ultimate source of energy.
If we compare the metaphysics of Aristostle and Plato,
we see that Aristotle's fundamental level is the bottom
level of Being, that of matter. Plato's metrap
6 matches
Mail list logo
