Re: Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

> On 28 Sep 2018, at 21:00, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 6:49:37 PM UTC, kujawski...@gmail.com wrote: > > Thank you everybody for your responses. > > Bruno Marchal I looked at your statement, they are very interesting but some > very good neruoscie

Re: Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

On Saturday, September 29, 2018 at 6:40:05 AM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 28 Sep 2018, at 18:37, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 4:04:41 PM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> On 28 Sep 2018, at 11:32, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> >> >> On Friday, Se

Re: Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

> On 28 Sep 2018, at 20:49, kujawskilucja...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Thank you everybody for your responses. > > Bruno Marchal I looked at your statement, they are very interesting but some > very good neruoscientists argue that brain is not like computer > Here for example (4min video) Edelm

Re: Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

> On 28 Sep 2018, at 20:26, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 11:00:58 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > Yet, I define matter by “the object of study of physics”, or the study of the > observable mode, making strong materialism implying physicalism. > > > Bruno

Re: Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

> On 28 Sep 2018, at 18:37, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 4:04:41 PM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> On 28 Sep 2018, at 11:32, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> >> >> On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 1:02:36 AM UTC, kujawski...@gmail.com >>

Re: Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 4:37:17 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 4:04:41 PM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> On 28 Sep 2018, at 11:32, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> >> >> On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 1:02:36 AM UTC, kujawski...@gmail.co

Re: Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 6:49:37 PM UTC, kujawski...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Thank you everybody for your responses. > > Bruno Marchal I looked at your statement, they are very interesting but > some very good neruoscientists argue that brain is not like computer > Here for example (4

Re: Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

Thank you everybody for your responses. Bruno Marchal I looked at your statement, they are very interesting but some very good neruoscientists argue that brain is not like computer Here for example (4min video) Edelman: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmyfQY4TaVc Please give me your thought o

Re: Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

Thank you everybody for your responses. O Lord discussion go very technical, maybe I'm too uneducated for questions like that, but at least I have some glimpses on intuitive level. Bruno Marchal I looked at your statement, they are very interesting but some very good neruoscientists argue that

Re: Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 11:00:58 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > Yet, I define matter by “the object of study of physics”, or the study of > the observable mode, making strong materialism implying physicalism. > > > Bruno > I think (along with Philip Goff*) that physics is not com

Re: Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 4:04:41 PM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 28 Sep 2018, at 11:32, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 1:02:36 AM UTC, kujawski...@gmail.com > wrote: >> >> Hello I think this good forum for this topic - what do you think about

Re: Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

> On 28 Sep 2018, at 17:10, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 8:52:19 AM UTC-5, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 12:42:11 PM UTC, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 2:44:18 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:

Re: Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

> On 28 Sep 2018, at 17:09, smitra wrote: > > On 28-09-2018 00:34, kujawskilucja...@gmail.com wrote: >> Hello I think this good forum for this topic - what do you think about >> Mathematical Universe, there are very big arguments for that >> hypothesis: >> - applicability of mathematic, to natu

Re: Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

> On 28 Sep 2018, at 11:32, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 1:02:36 AM UTC, kujawski...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello I think this good forum for this topic - what do you think about > Mathematical Universe, there are very big arguments for that hypothesis: >

Re: Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

> On 28 Sep 2018, at 14:42, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 2:44:18 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> On 28 Sep 2018, at 00:34, kujawski...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> Hello I think this good forum for this topic - what do you think about >> Mathematical Universe

Re: Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 8:52:19 AM UTC-5, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 12:42:11 PM UTC, Philip Thrift wrote: >> >> >> >> On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 2:44:18 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 28 Sep 2018, at 00:34, kujawski...@gmail

Re: Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

On 28-09-2018 00:34, kujawskilucja...@gmail.com wrote: Hello I think this good forum for this topic - what do you think about Mathematical Universe, there are very big arguments for that hypothesis: - applicability of mathematic, to natural sciences - all we discovere are structures and I didnt

Re: Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 12:42:11 PM UTC, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 2:44:18 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> On 28 Sep 2018, at 00:34, kujawski...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> Hello I think this good forum for this topic - what do you think about >> M

Re: Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 2:44:18 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 28 Sep 2018, at 00:34, kujawski...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hello I think this good forum for this topic - what do you think about > Mathematical Universe, there are very big arguments for that hypothesis: > > > Yes, i

Re: Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 1:02:36 AM UTC, kujawski...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hello I think this good forum for this topic - what do you think about > Mathematical Universe, there are very big arguments for that hypothesis: > f > - applicability of mathematic, to natural sciences > - all we

Re: Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

> On 28 Sep 2018, at 06:52, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > On Thursday, September 27, 2018 at 8:02:36 PM UTC-5, kujawski...@gmail.com > wrote: > Hello I think this good forum for this topic - what do you think about > Mathematical Universe, there are very big arguments for that hypothesis: >

Re: Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

> On 28 Sep 2018, at 00:34, kujawskilucja...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hello I think this good forum for this topic - what do you think about > Mathematical Universe, there are very big arguments for that hypothesis: Yes, it was proved as a consequence of the Mechanist Hypothesis (well before Tegma

Re: Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

On Thursday, September 27, 2018 at 8:02:36 PM UTC-5, kujawski...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hello I think this good forum for this topic - what do you think about > Mathematical Universe, there are very big arguments for that hypothesis: > > - applicability of mathematic, to natural sciences > - all

Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

Hello I think this good forum for this topic - what do you think about Mathematical Universe, there are very big arguments for that hypothesis: - applicability of mathematic, to natural sciences - all we discovere are structures and I didnt find explanation of the diference beetwen physical stru

<    1   2   3   4