On Monday, August 26, 2019 at 4:42:18 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 25 Aug 2019, at 20:27, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, August 25, 2019 at 12:56:57 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/25/2019 1:13 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Ironically (and I thought this at
> On 25 Aug 2019, at 20:27, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, August 25, 2019 at 12:56:57 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>
>
> On 8/25/2019 1:13 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>> Ironically (and I thought this at the time almost 20 years ago now when I
>> was interacting with Vic on his old
On Sunday, August 25, 2019 at 12:56:57 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/25/2019 1:13 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> Ironically (and I thought this at the time almost 20 years ago now when I
> was interacting with Vic on his old group [
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/atvoid
On 8/25/2019 1:13 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:
Ironically (and I thought this at the time almost 20 years ago now
when I was interacting with Vic on his old group [
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/atvoid ]) is that "laws
from symmetry" and "symmetry-breaking were contradictory to
On Saturday, August 24, 2019 at 11:26:54 PM UTC-5, Russell Standish wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 10:24:47PM -0700, Philip Thrift wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Friday, August 23, 2019 at 5:54:17 PM UTC-5, Russell Standish wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:28:39AM +0200, Bruno Marcha
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 10:24:47PM -0700, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, August 23, 2019 at 5:54:17 PM UTC-5, Russell Standish wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:28:39AM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >
> > On 20 Aug 2019, at 19:38, Philip Thrift wrote:
> >
> >
> On 24 Aug 2019, at 00:54, Russell Standish wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:28:39AM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>On 20 Aug 2019, at 19:38, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>The reason to suspect that arithmetic comes from matter (M→A) vs. matter
>>comes from arithmetic
On Friday, August 23, 2019 at 5:54:17 PM UTC-5, Russell Standish wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:28:39AM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >
> > On 20 Aug 2019, at 19:38, Philip Thrift > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > The reason to suspect that arithmetic comes from matter (M→A) vs.
> m
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:28:39AM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 20 Aug 2019, at 19:38, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> The reason to suspect that arithmetic comes from matter (M→A) vs. matter
> comes from arithmetic (A→M) is that with A→M there many Ms.
>
>
> On the contrary:
> On 22 Aug 2019, at 11:32, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, August 22, 2019 at 3:34:02 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> > On 21 Aug 2019, at 21:17, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
> > > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/21/2019 1:28 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >> So A explains w
On Thursday, August 22, 2019 at 3:34:02 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> > On 21 Aug 2019, at 21:17, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <
> everyth...@googlegroups.com > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/21/2019 1:28 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >> So A explains why there is only one M possible
> On 21 Aug 2019, at 21:17, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/21/2019 1:28 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>> So A explains why there is only one M possible
>
> So what is the one possible M? Physicist build 10 billion dollar machines to
> try to find out. If you can do i
On 8/21/2019 1:28 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
So A explains why there is only one M possible
So what is the one possible M? Physicist build 10 billion dollar
machines to try to find out. If you can do it from your desk, let's
hear about it?
Brent
--
You received this message because you
On Wednesday, August 21, 2019 at 7:38:49 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 21 Aug 2019, at 13:03, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, August 21, 2019 at 3:28:42 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 20 Aug 2019, at 19:38, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, August
> On 21 Aug 2019, at 13:03, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, August 21, 2019 at 3:28:42 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 20 Aug 2019, at 19:38, Philip Thrift >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 at 6:27:51 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>> On 19 Aug 201
On Wednesday, August 21, 2019 at 3:28:42 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 20 Aug 2019, at 19:38, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 at 6:27:51 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 19 Aug 2019, at 21:11, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, August 19
> On 20 Aug 2019, at 20:04, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/20/2019 4:27 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>> Given all the novel, unpredicted stuff one reads every day in the science
>>> news feeds about some new material (materials science), molecules, phases
>>> (of ma
> On 20 Aug 2019, at 19:38, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 at 6:27:51 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 19 Aug 2019, at 21:11, Philip Thrift >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, August 19, 2019 at 9:43:38 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>> On 19 Aug 2019,
On 8/20/2019 4:27 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Given all the novel, unpredicted stuff one reads every day in the
science news feeds about some new material (materials science),
molecules, phases (of matter), why is it so hard to think that
matter is not some naive ("numerical-Turing-emulable")
On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 at 6:27:51 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 19 Aug 2019, at 21:11, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, August 19, 2019 at 9:43:38 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 19 Aug 2019, at 11:50, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, August 19, 2
> On 19 Aug 2019, at 21:11, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, August 19, 2019 at 9:43:38 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 19 Aug 2019, at 11:50, Philip Thrift >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, August 19, 2019 at 4:08:58 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>> On 18 Aug 2019, a
On Monday, August 19, 2019 at 9:43:38 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 19 Aug 2019, at 11:50, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, August 19, 2019 at 4:08:58 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 18 Aug 2019, at 13:57, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, August 18, 20
> On 19 Aug 2019, at 11:50, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, August 19, 2019 at 4:08:58 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 18 Aug 2019, at 13:57, Philip Thrift >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, August 18, 2019 at 4:53:28 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>> Model theory illus
On Monday, August 19, 2019 at 4:08:58 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 18 Aug 2019, at 13:57, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, August 18, 2019 at 4:53:28 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> Model theory illustrate that pure mathematics has meaning.
>>
>
>
> A model is a
> On 18 Aug 2019, at 13:57, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, August 18, 2019 at 4:53:28 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> Model theory illustrate that pure mathematics has meaning.
>
>
> A model is a so-called 'structure':
> https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/model-theory/
>
On Sunday, August 18, 2019 at 4:53:28 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> Model theory illustrate that pure mathematics has meaning.
>
A model is a so-called 'structure':
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/model-theory/
But allowable structures, typically mathematical entities in the model
26 matches
Mail list logo