ng-list@googlegroups.com
<mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>
*Sent:* Thursday, May 20, 2010 4:35 PM
*Subject:* Re: Quantum Immortality considering "Passing Out"
On 20/05/2010, at 4:12 PM, "m.a." mailto:marty...@bellsouth.
gt; - Original Message -
>> *From:* Stathis Papaioannou
>> *To:* everything-list@googlegroups.com
>> *Sent:* Thursday, May 20, 2010 4:35 PM
>> *Subject:* Re: Quantum Immortality considering "Passing Out"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>&
he state of the
individual at each moment in time.
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 5:59 AM, m.a. wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Stathis Papaioannou
> *To:* everything-list@googlegroups.com
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 20, 2010 4:35 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Quantum
I am afraid you start from the 2nd step: first you accept whatever 'we'
(humans) think as an evidence in the system we can absorb and evaluate
(explain) and then - *in the framework of that *we imagine our science.
Indeed not much more than a belief system of today.
Not too different from the so ca
On 23 May 2010, at 23:01, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 5/23/2010 9:32 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Hi Alex, hi Quentin,
On 20 May 2010, at 15:19, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Hi,
2010/5/20 awak
1. Hello everyone! I'm Alex. I'm a civil engineer with an avid
passion for
Popular Science books. I'm not a
On 24 May 2010 23:08, John Mikes wrote:
> Stathis,
>
> you seemed bored: you jumped into assigning a bit more to my text than it
> really contained:
> "...saying that we can know nothing about it at all..."
> what I did not say. I spoke about a 'hypothetical' functioning of the world
> (read the '
On 5/24/2010 6:08 AM, John Mikes wrote:
Stathis,
you seemed bored: you jumped into assigning a bit more to my text than
it really contained:
_/"...saying that we can know nothing about it at all..."/
_
what I did not say. I spoke about a 'hypothetical' functioning of the
world (read the/ 'imag
Stathis,
you seemed bored: you jumped into assigning a bit more to my text than it
really contained:
*"...saying that we can know nothing about it at all..."
*
what I did not say. I spoke about a 'hypothetical' functioning of the world
(read the* 'imagining"it")*
and it refers to how we explain 'i
On 24 May 2010 01:12, John Mikes wrote:
> Stathis,
> I hate to go into a 'fault-finding' trip, but what gives you the idea that
> "the universe works" in any way WE, stupid consequences THINK OF in any
> fashion?
> The universe (???) or anything we translate into universes in our limited
> minds -
Thank you for the responses.
Brent Meeker-2 wrote:
>
> On 5/23/2010 9:32 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>> Hi Alex, hi Quentin,
>>
>> On 20 May 2010, at 15:19, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 2010/5/20 awak mailto:mustata_a...@yahoo.com>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 1. Hello everyone! I'm Alex. I'm a c
On 5/23/2010 9:32 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Hi Alex, hi Quentin,
On 20 May 2010, at 15:19, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Hi,
2010/5/20 awak mailto:mustata_a...@yahoo.com>>
1. Hello everyone! I'm Alex. I'm a civil engineer with an avid
passion for
Popular Science books. I'm not a scienti
.com
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: Quantum Immortality considering "Passing Out"
Hi,
2010/5/20 awak
1. Hello everyone! I'm Alex. I'm a civil engineer with an avid
passion for
Popular Science books. I'm not a scientist, nor a native English
spea
Hi Alex, hi Quentin,
On 20 May 2010, at 15:19, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Hi,
2010/5/20 awak
1. Hello everyone! I'm Alex. I'm a civil engineer with an avid
passion for
Popular Science books. I'm not a scientist, nor a native English
speaker, so
please excuse my possible inconsistencies in b
2010/5/23 John Mikes
> Stathis,
> I hate to go into a 'fault-finding' trip, but what gives you the idea that
> "the universe works" in any way WE, stupid consequences THINK OF in any
> fashion?
> The universe (???) or anything we translate into universes in our limited
> minds - MAY work in its o
Stathis,
I hate to go into a 'fault-finding' trip, but what gives you the idea that
"the universe works" in any way WE, stupid consequences THINK OF in any
fashion?
The universe (???) or anything we translate into universes in our limited
minds - MAY work in its own unrestricted ways and we - with
On 23 May 2010 05:26, John Mikes wrote:
> Stathis:
> how about a wording version of your remark:
> "you may as well claim that we should not make up an "infinite universe
> story" that would boggle the human mind"?
> I am not against the 'exist', because any idea does exist (at least in the
> mind
Stathis:
how about a wording version of your remark:
"you may as well claim that we should not make up an "infinite universe
story" that would boggle the human mind"?
I am not against the 'exist', because any idea does exist (at least in the
mind of the initiator).
John M
On 5/20/10, Stathis Pap
ilto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>
*Sent:* Thursday, May 20, 2010 4:35 PM
*Subject:* Re: Quantum Immortality considering "Passing Out"
On 20/05/2010, at 4:12 PM, "m.a." mailto:marty...@bellsouth.net>> wrote:
I may have t
- Original Message -
From: Quentin Anciaux
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: Quantum Immortality considering "Passing Out"
2010/5/21 m.a.
- Original Message -
From: Stathis Papaioannou
2010/5/21 m.a.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Stathis Papaioannou
> *To:* everything-list@googlegroups.com
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 20, 2010 4:35 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Quantum Immortality considering "Passing Out"
>
>
>
>
Why in the f
2010/5/21 m.a.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Stathis Papaioannou
> *To:* everything-list@googlegroups.com
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 20, 2010 4:35 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Quantum Immortality considering "Passing Out"
>
>
>
>
> On 20/05/201
- Original Message -
From: Stathis Papaioannou
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: Quantum Immortality considering "Passing Out"
On 20/05/2010, at 4:12 PM, "m.a." wrote:
I may have this all
On 20/05/2010, at 4:12 PM, "m.a." wrote:
I may have this all wrong, but it seems to me that for there to be
umpteen trillion copies of a person there had to be umpteen trillion
(UT) copies of his parents. And only a relatively small sub-group of
those met and cohabited at the exact mome
ciaux
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: Quantum Immortality considering "Passing Out"
Hi,
2010/5/20 awak
1. Hello everyone! I'm Alex. I'm a civil engineer with an avid passion for
Popular Science b
Hi,
2010/5/20 awak
>
> 1. Hello everyone! I'm Alex. I'm a civil engineer with an avid passion for
> Popular Science books. I'm not a scientist, nor a native English speaker,
> so
> please excuse my possible inconsistencies in both Scientific logic or
> English grammar. Again, sorry if this quest
1. Hello everyone! I'm Alex. I'm a civil engineer with an avid passion for
Popular Science books. I'm not a scientist, nor a native English speaker, so
please excuse my possible inconsistencies in both Scientific logic or
English grammar. Again, sorry if this question has already been posed.
2.
26 matches
Mail list logo
