The suggestion that the one consciousness could inhabit more than one physical
body does not predict telepathy -- it could merely indicate that consciousness
is not localized to a single physical body, that it is non-local, for instance.
Or, indeed, that physics is not fundamental but d
On 8/2/2016 11:37 PM, 'scerir' via Everything List wrote:
The suggestion that the one consciousness could inhabit more than one physical
body does not predict telepathy -- it could merely indicate that consciousness
is not localized to a single physical body, that it is non-local, for
On 3/08/2016 4:37 pm, 'scerir' via Everything List wrote:
The suggestion that the one consciousness could inhabit more than one physical
body does not predict telepathy -- it could merely indicate that consciousness
is not localized to a single physical body, that it is non-local, for inst
On 03 Aug 2016, at 08:50, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 3/08/2016 4:37 pm, 'scerir' via Everything List wrote:
The suggestion that the one consciousness could inhabit more
than one physical
body does not predict telepathy -- it could merely indicate that
consciousness
is not localized to a s
>> The suggestion that the one consciousness could inhabit more than one
physical
>> body does not predict telepathy -- it could merely indicate that
consciousness
>> is not localized to a single physical body, that it is non-local, for
instance.
>> Or, indeed, that physics is not fundamental bu
>Messaggio originale
>Da: "Brent Meeker"
>Data: 03/08/2016 8.49
>A:
>Ogg: Re: R: Re: Holiday Exercise
>
>
>
>On 8/2/2016 11:37 PM, 'scerir' via Everything List wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> The suggestion that the o
6 matches
Mail list logo
