On 14.10.2012 01:46 Russell Standish said the following:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:16:06PM +0200, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Another question here would be who will divide the state space to
a bacterium and environment. Let us imagine that we have
implemented somehow a bacterium in Game of Life (or
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:55:59AM +0200, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 14.10.2012 01:46 Russell Standish said the following:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:16:06PM +0200, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Another question here would be who will divide the state space to
a bacterium and environment. Let us imagine
On 12.10.2012 22:54 Russell Standish said the following:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 08:23:33AM -0400, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Russell Standish
Life cannot survive without making choices, like where to go next.
To avoid an enemy. To get food.
This act of life obviously requires an autonomous
. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Russell Standish
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-10-12, 16:54:43
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Conscious robots
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 08:23:33AM -0400, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Russell Standish
Life cannot survive
Time: 2012-10-12, 17:40:10
Subject: Re: Conscious robots
On 10/12/2012 1:54 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 08:23:33AM -0400, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Russell Standish
Life cannot survive without making choices,
like where to go next. To avoid an enemy. To get food
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:27:01PM -0400, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Russell Standish
I should stay away from discussing bacteria. Brownian motion and
chemical actions could in fact make intelligence (free choice-making)
unnecessary, as you may have suggested.
Why avoid the topic? By
if it
has any of these.
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
10/11/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Evgenii Rudnyi
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-10-11, 07:58:57
Subject: Re: Conscious
of intelligence.
QED
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
10/12/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Russell Standish
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-10-11, 16:53:42
Subject: Re: Re: Conscious robots
On Thu
On 10/12/2012 3:40 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
life, consciousness, free will, intelligence
I try to give a phsical definition of each one:
Life: whathever that maintain its internal entropy in a non trivial way (A diamant is
not alive). That is, to make use of hardwired and adquired
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 08:23:33AM -0400, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Russell Standish
Life cannot survive without making choices,
like where to go next. To avoid an enemy. To get food.
This act of life obviously requires an autonomous choice.
Nobody can make it for you. It can't be
On 10/12/2012 1:54 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 08:23:33AM -0400, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Russell Standish
Life cannot survive without making choices,
like where to go next. To avoid an enemy. To get food.
This act of life obviously requires an autonomous choice.
Nobody
On 26.09.2012 20:35 meekerdb said the following:
An interesting paper which comports with my idea that the problem of
consciousness will be solved by engineering. Or John Clark's
point that consciousness is easy, intelligence is hard.
Consciousness in Cognitive Architectures A Principled
On 11.10.2012 11:36 Evgenii Rudnyi said the following:
On 26.09.2012 20:35 meekerdb said the following:
An interesting paper which comports with my idea that the problem
of consciousness will be solved by engineering. Or John
Clark's point that consciousness is easy, intelligence is hard.
...@verizon.net
10/11/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Evgenii Rudnyi
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-10-11, 07:58:57
Subject: Re: Conscious robots
On 11.10.2012 11:36 Evgenii Rudnyi said
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
Consciousness is easy if you already have consciousness. It is impossible
if you don't.
But you believe in panexperientialism, you believe that everything is
conscious, so if you are correct then consciousness is not only
Subject: Re: Conscious robots
On 11.10.2012 11:36 Evgenii Rudnyi said the following:
On 26.09.2012 20:35 meekerdb said the following:
An interesting paper which comports with my idea that the problem
of consciousness will be solved by engineering. Or John
Clark's point
On Thursday, October 11, 2012 11:05:23 AM UTC-4, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
Consciousness is easy if you already have consciousness. It is
impossible if you don't.
But you believe in panexperientialism, you believe that
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2:35:27 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
An interesting paper which comports with my idea that the problem of
consciousness will be solved by engineering. Or John Clark's point that
consciousness is easy, intelligence is hard.
Consciousness is easy if you already
On 9/26/2012 12:19 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2:35:27 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
An interesting paper which comports with my idea that the problem of
consciousness
will be solved by engineering. Or John Clark's point that consciousness
is easy,
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 3:37:09 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 9/26/2012 12:19 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2:35:27 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
An interesting paper which comports with my idea that the problem of
consciousness will be solved by
20 matches
Mail list logo
